This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.
⚠ Repair
Search captured: collision repair in St. Cloud, MN
Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “collision repair in St. Cloud, MN”.
Collision Repair Services in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility
Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for collision repair services providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.
🏢 16 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 64.36/100⭐ Median Reviews: 49.5📡 567 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:
City map view · St. Cloud, MN
These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.
Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 16
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
16 mapped businesses shown.
Top 4 side by side
Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.
Local Visibility: +26.25 above market median (100 vs 73.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
St. Cloud Collision Center was observed at position #1 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
St. Cloud Collision Center is 26.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (100 versus 73.75). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 122 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility: +23.75 above market median (97.5 vs 73.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Miller Auto Body was observed at position #2 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
Miller Auto Body is 23.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (97.5 versus 73.75). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 450 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Reviews: +18.19 above market median (94.56 vs 76.37)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
ABRA Auto Body St. Cloud was observed at position #3 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
ABRA Auto Body St. Cloud is 18.19 points above the measured market median for reviews (94.56 versus 76.37). Observed review volume is 621 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: +18.75 above market median (92.5 vs 73.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Peters Body Shop was observed at position #4 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Peters Body Shop is 18.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (92.5 versus 73.75). Observed review volume is 436 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
NORTHSTAR COLLISION was observed at position #5 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
NORTHSTAR COLLISION is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (50 versus 25). Observed review volume is 113 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Reviews: +4.52 above market median (80.89 vs 76.37)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Caliber Collision was observed at position #6 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Caliber Collision is 4.52 points above the measured market median for reviews (80.89 versus 76.37). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 93 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility: +11.25 above market median (85 vs 73.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Reiter's Body Shop Inc was observed at position #7 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Reiter's Body Shop Inc is 11.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (85 versus 73.75). Its local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 19 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Connect the official website to the local profile[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +41.67 above market median (75 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -8.75 below market median (65 vs 73.75)[1][2]
Augusta Auto Body was observed at position #8 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Augusta Auto Body is 41.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 33.33). Its local visibility score is 8.75 points below the measured market median (65 versus 73.75). Observed review volume is 222 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -13.75 below market median (60 vs 73.75)[1][2]
D & B AUTO BODY was observed at position #9 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
D & B AUTO BODY is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its local visibility score is 13.75 points below the measured market median (60 versus 73.75). Observed review volume is 46 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Local Visibility: +3.75 above market median (77.5 vs 73.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Gross Body & Frame Alignment was observed at position #10 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Gross Body & Frame Alignment is 3.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (77.5 versus 73.75). Its local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 35 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Connect the official website to the local profile[1][2]
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Martins Auto Body was observed at position #12 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Martins Auto Body is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 16 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
Technical SEO: -50 below market median (33.33 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Falcon Auto LLC was observed at position #13 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Falcon Auto LLC's technical seo score is 50 points below the measured market median (33.33 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 14 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +16.67 above market median (50 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -38.75 below market median (35 vs 73.75)[1][2]
CMS Autobody was observed at position #14 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 12 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
CMS Autobody is 16.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 33.33). Its local visibility score is 38.75 points below the measured market median (35 versus 73.75). Observed review volume is 53 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Technical SEO: -33.33 below market median (50 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Dents Unlimited, Inc. was observed at position #15 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 13 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Dents Unlimited, Inc.'s technical seo score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (50 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 25 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: -48.75 below market median (25 vs 73.75)[1][2]
Kc Autobody was observed at position #16 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 14 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Kc Autobody's local visibility score is 48.75 points below the measured market median (25 versus 73.75). Observed review volume is 9 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +33.34 above market median (66.67 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -76.37 below market median (0 vs 76.37)[1][2]
North Central Body Shop was observed at position #17 for the "collision repair in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 3, 2026 observation. 15 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
North Central Body Shop is 33.34 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (66.67 versus 33.33). Its reviews score is 76.37 points below the measured market median (0 versus 76.37). Observed review volume is 0 versus a market median of 49.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards
Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.
Snapshot ID: 127df4b1-2edf-4859-bb20-4805ac17cf57 · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-10-03 20:17 UTC · Published: 2026-10-03 20:17 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0
This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.
View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.