Skip to content
Purpose-built comparison

carpenter in in St. Cloud, MN

This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.

Search captured: carpenter in St. Cloud, MN

Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “carpenter in St. Cloud, MN”.

Carpenters in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility

Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for carpenters providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.

🏢 20 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 59.42/100⭐ Median Reviews: 8📡 722 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:

City map view · St. Cloud, MN

These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.

Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 20
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
20 mapped businesses shown.

Top 4 side by side

Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.

The rest of this comparison

RankBusinessRatingGoogle listing quoteLocal Pulse
#5Joseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC.——Profile
#6Jim's Carpentry & Roofing——Profile
#7Handyman 2 Your Rescue——Profile
#8Dale Gruber Construction——Profile
#9Abbington Cabinetry LLC——Profile
#10Master Trade Services Inc——Profile
#11Renaissance Design Group——Profile
#12Wilkie Sanderson——Profile
#13Hansen & Company Woodworks——Profile
#14Riverstone Incorporated——Profile
#15Werschay Homes——Profile
#16Focal Point Fixtures Inc.——Profile
#17Modern Kraft Construction4.9 ★ (27)“We came to Modern Kraft with a kitchen stuck in the 80s — think oak cabinets, laminate co…”—Profile
#18Red Wolf Woodworks——Profile
#19Trimmers Inc.——Profile
#20Schoenberg Construction, Inc.5.0 ★ (7)“We worked exclusively with Schoenberg Construction throughout 2016 on our extensive home…”—Profile
Open NextDoorScore factor analysis for every listing
76.2 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +16.78 points
Market Position: 91.18th percentile
Local Visibility
100
+28.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+2 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +33.33 above market median (100 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Opie’s Woodshop and More was observed at position #1 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online

Opie’s Woodshop and More is 33.33 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 66.67). Observed review volume is 10 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
76.72 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +17.3 points
Market Position: 97.06th percentile
Local Visibility
97.5
+26.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
27
+19 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +33.33 above market median (100 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
VanVleet Construction was observed at position #2 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
Why This Business Differs Online

VanVleet Construction is 33.33 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 66.67). Observed review volume is 27 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
71.26 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +11.84 points
Market Position: 85.29th percentile
Local Visibility
95
+23.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-1 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +33.33 above market median (100 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration was observed at position #3 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
  2. #2 VanVleet Construction
Why This Business Differs Online

Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration is 33.33 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 66.67). Observed review volume is 7 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
60.03 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +0.61 points
Market Position: 55.88th percentile
Local Visibility
92.5
+21.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
5
-3 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (25 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Pine Point Construction LLC was observed at position #4 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
  2. #2 VanVleet Construction
  3. #3 Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration
Why This Business Differs Online

Pine Point Construction LLC is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (25 versus 0). Its entity consistency score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 5 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
50.76 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -8.66 points
Market Position: 26.47th percentile
Local Visibility
80
+8.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
50
-16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-1 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +8.75 above market median (80 vs 71.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Joseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC. was observed at position #5 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
  2. #2 VanVleet Construction
  3. #3 Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration
  4. #4 Pine Point Construction LLC
Why This Business Differs Online

Joseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC. is 8.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (80 versus 71.25). Its entity consistency score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 7 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility
87.5
+16.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-1 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +16.25 above market median (87.5 vs 71.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -10.73 below market median (54.05 vs 64.78)[1][2]
Jim's Carpentry & Roofing was observed at position #6 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
  2. #2 VanVleet Construction
  3. #3 Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration
  4. #4 Pine Point Construction LLC
  5. #5 Joseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC.
Why This Business Differs Online

Jim's Carpentry & Roofing is 16.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (87.5 versus 71.25). Its reviews score is 10.73 points below the measured market median (54.05 versus 64.78). Observed review volume is 7 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
65.21 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +5.79 points
Market Position: 73.53th percentile
Local Visibility
85
+13.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+7 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +33.33 above market median (100 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -1.71 below market median (63.07 vs 64.78)[1][2]
Handyman 2 Your Rescue was observed at position #7 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
  2. #2 VanVleet Construction
  3. #3 Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration
  4. #4 Pine Point Construction LLC
  5. #5 Joseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC.
  6. #6 Jim's Carpentry & Roofing
Why This Business Differs Online

Handyman 2 Your Rescue is 33.33 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 66.67). Its reviews score is 1.71 points below the measured market median (63.07 versus 64.78). Observed review volume is 15 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
66.66 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +7.24 points
Market Position: 79.41th percentile
Local Visibility
82.5
+11.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+8 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (25 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Dale Gruber Construction was observed at position #8 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
  2. #2 VanVleet Construction
  3. #3 Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration
  4. #4 Pine Point Construction LLC
  5. #5 Joseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC.
  6. #6 Jim's Carpentry & Roofing
  7. #7 Handyman 2 Your Rescue
Why This Business Differs Online

Dale Gruber Construction is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (25 versus 0). Observed review volume is 16 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility
80
+8.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-6 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +8.75 above market median (80 vs 71.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Abbington Cabinetry LLC was observed at position #9 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
  2. #2 VanVleet Construction
  3. #3 Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration
  4. #4 Pine Point Construction LLC
  5. #5 Joseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC.
  6. #6 Jim's Carpentry & Roofing
  7. #7 Handyman 2 Your Rescue
  8. #8 Dale Gruber Construction
Why This Business Differs Online

Abbington Cabinetry LLC is 8.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (80 versus 71.25). Its local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 2 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Connect the official website to the local profile[1][2]
60.68 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +1.26 points
Market Position: 61.76th percentile
Local Visibility
55
-16.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+8 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +33.33 above market median (100 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -16.25 below market median (55 vs 71.25)[1][2]
Master Trade Services Inc was observed at position #10 for the "carpenter in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 4, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Opie’s Woodshop and More
  2. #2 VanVleet Construction
  3. #3 Central Minnesota Repair & Restoration
  4. #4 Pine Point Construction LLC
  5. #5 Joseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC.
  6. #6 Jim's Carpentry & Roofing
  7. #7 Handyman 2 Your Rescue
  8. #8 Dale Gruber Construction
  9. #9 Abbington Cabinetry LLC
Why This Business Differs Online

Master Trade Services Inc is 33.33 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 66.67). Its local visibility score is 16.25 points below the measured market median (55 versus 71.25). Observed review volume is 16 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
57.18 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -2.24 points
Market Position: 44.12th percentile
Local Visibility
75
+3.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
+16.66 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+7 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +16.66 above market median (83.33 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Renaissance Design Group is 16.66 points above the measured market median for technical seo (83.33 versus 66.67). Its entity consistency score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 15 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
54.83 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -4.59 points
Market Position: 38.24th percentile
Local Visibility
45
-26.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+1 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -26.25 below market median (45 vs 71.25)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Wilkie Sanderson is 25 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 26.25 points below the measured market median (45 versus 71.25). Observed review volume is 9 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
32.09 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -27.33 points
Market Position: 14.71th percentile
Local Visibility
40
-31.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-66.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+4 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -66.67 below market median (0 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Hansen & Company Woodworks's technical seo score is 66.67 points below the measured market median (0 versus 66.67). Observed review volume is 12 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility
67.5
-3.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-7 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Riverstone Incorporated's local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Connect the official website to the local profile[1][2]
#15
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
62.5 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +3.08 points
Market Position: 67.65th percentile
Local Visibility
65
-6.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
+16.66 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+18 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -6.25 below market median (65 vs 71.25)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Werschay Homes is 25 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 6.25 points below the measured market median (65 versus 71.25). Observed review volume is 26 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
42.86 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -16.56 points
Market Position: 20.59th percentile
Local Visibility
62.5
-8.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
33.33
-33.34 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-6 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -33.34 below market median (33.33 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Focal Point Fixtures Inc.'s technical seo score is 33.34 points below the measured market median (33.33 versus 66.67). Observed review volume is 2 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
51.3 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -8.12 points
Market Position: 32.35th percentile
Local Visibility
60
-11.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
27
+19 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +8.34 above market median (73.12 vs 64.78)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Modern Kraft Construction is 8.34 points above the measured market median for reviews (73.12 versus 64.78). Its entity consistency score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 27 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
28 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -31.42 points
Market Position: 2.94th percentile
Local Visibility
15
-56.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
50
-16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-8 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -64.78 below market median (0 vs 64.78)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Red Wolf Woodworks's reviews score is 64.78 points below the measured market median (0 versus 64.78). Observed review volume is 0 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
#19
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
30.33 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -29.09 points
Market Position: 8.82th percentile
Local Visibility
10
-61.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-8 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -64.78 below market median (0 vs 64.78)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Trimmers Inc.'s reviews score is 64.78 points below the measured market median (0 versus 64.78). Observed review volume is 0 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
59.42 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: 0 points
Market Position: 50th percentile
Local Visibility
52.5
-18.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
+16.66 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
7
-1 vs median (8)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (25 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -18.75 below market median (52.5 vs 71.25)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Schoenberg Construction, Inc. is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (25 versus 0). Its local visibility score is 18.75 points below the measured market median (52.5 versus 71.25). Observed review volume is 7 versus a market median of 8; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]

Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards

Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.

Highest Observed Local Visibility Scores
Market Median: 71.25 · Average: 67.38 · Range: 10–100 (20 measured)

Service × Location Content Detection Matrix

Observed coverage of essential service and location content on sampled official websites.

Detected Content CheckTrimmers Inc.Jim's Carpentry & RoofingSchoenberg Construction, Inc.Dale Gruber ConstructionFocal Point Fixtures Inc.Hansen & Company WoodworksHandyman 2 Your RescueVanVleet ConstructionCentral Minnesota Repair & RestorationAbbington Cabinetry LLCWerschay HomesRiverstone IncorporatedWilkie SandersonJoseph's Carpentry and Construction LLC.Red Wolf WoodworksPine Point Construction LLCMaster Trade Services IncOpie’s Woodshop and MoreRenaissance Design GroupModern Kraft Construction
Service content
17 measured
✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]
Location content
17 measured
✗ Not detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]
Service and location coverage
17 measured
✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]
Relevant FAQs
17 measured
✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]

Snapshot Provenance & Methodology Disclosure

Snapshot ID: 9821d70f-5a60-47de-af20-053b52b12e5d · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-10-04 18:28 UTC · Published: 2026-10-04 18:28 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0

This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.

View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
  • Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
  • Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
  • Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
  • Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
  • Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
  • Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
  • Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
  • Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
  • The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
  • Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
  • Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
  • Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
  • Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
  • Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
  • Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
  • Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.