™
#1
Sandahl & Damhof
St. Cloud, MN
75.9 Score—— Reviews
Local position: #1 of 20
Claim this businessView your private optimization opportunities.Purpose-built comparison
Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN
This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.
Search captured: Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN
Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN”.
Estate Planning Attorneys in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility
Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for estate planning attorneys providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.
🏢 20 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 63.31/100⭐ Median Reviews: 22.5📡 612 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:
City map view · St. Cloud, MN
These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.
20 mapped businesses shown.
Top 4 side by side
Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.
#2
Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.
St. Cloud, MN
68.8 Score—— Reviews
Local position: #2 of 20
Claim this businessView your private optimization opportunities.
#3
Rinke Noonan
St. Cloud, MN
69.5 Score—— Reviews
Local position: #3 of 20
Claim this businessView your private optimization opportunities.#4
Reichert Wenner, P.A.
St. Cloud, MN
— Score—— Reviews
Local position: #4 of 20
Claim this businessView your private optimization opportunities.The rest of this comparison
| Rank | Business | Rating | Google listing quote | Local Pulse | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #5 | Evenson Decker, P.A. | — | — | Profile | |
| #6 | Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes | — | — | Profile | |
| #7 | Kelm & Reuter, P.A. | — | — | Profile | |
| #8 | Heller & Thyen, P.A. | — | — | Profile | |
| #9 | PCG Law | — | — | Profile | |
| #10 | Hanson Law Office PA | — | — | Profile | |
| #11 | Revermann Lund Ross | — | — | Profile | |
| #12 | Syverson PLLC | — | — | Profile | |
| #13 | Paul Jeddeloh Attorney | — | — | Profile | |
| #14 | Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law | — | — | Profile | |
| #15 | Donohue Novak At Law | — | — | Profile | |
| #16 | Toepfer at Law, PLLC | — | — | Profile | |
| #17 | Lathrop GPM LLP | — | — | Profile | |
| #18 | RGP Law Ltd. | — | — | Profile | |
| #19 | Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.: Bradley W. Hanson | — | — | Profile | |
| #20 | Lund Ross, P.A. Law Firm | — | — | Profile |
Open NextDoorScore factor analysis for every listing
75.86 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +12.55 points
Market Position: 96.43th percentile
Local Visibility
100
+30 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-16.5 vs median (22.5)
Sandahl & Damhof was observed at position #1 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Sandahl & Damhof is 30 points above the measured market median for local visibility (100 versus 70). Its reviews score is 2.72 points below the measured market median (64.08 versus 66.8). Observed review volume is 6 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
68.83 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +5.52 points
Market Position: 67.86th percentile
Local Visibility
97.5
+27.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+15.5 vs median (22.5)
Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A. was observed at position #2 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A. is 27.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (97.5 versus 70). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 38 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]
69.52 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +6.21 points
Market Position: 82.14th percentile
Local Visibility
95
+25 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
-16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+14.5 vs median (22.5)
Rinke Noonan was observed at position #3 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Rinke Noonan is 25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (95 versus 70). Its technical seo score is 16.67 points below the measured market median (83.33 versus 100). Observed review volume is 37 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add clear primary headings on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Local Visibility
92.5
+22.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
+13.5 vs median (22.5)
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Reichert Wenner, P.A. was observed at position #4 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Local Visibility
90
+20 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
+19.5 vs median (22.5)
Evenson Decker, P.A. was observed at position #5 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Evenson Decker, P.A. is 20 points above the measured market median for local visibility (90 versus 70). Its reviews score is 0.58 points below the measured market median (66.22 versus 66.8). Observed review volume is 42 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment.[1][2][3]
75.5 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +12.19 points
Market Position: 89.29th percentile
Local Visibility
87.5
+17.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+76.5 vs median (22.5)
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes was observed at position #6 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes is 17.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (87.5 versus 70). Observed review volume is 99 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Local Visibility
70
0 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
+54.5 vs median (22.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Kelm & Reuter, P.A. was observed at position #7 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Kelm & Reuter, P.A.'s reviews score is 0.27 points below the measured market median (66.53 versus 66.8). Observed review volume is 77 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
69.18 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +5.87 points
Market Position: 75th percentile
Local Visibility
82.5
+12.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
-16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+137.5 vs median (22.5)
Heller & Thyen, P.A. was observed at position #8 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Heller & Thyen, P.A. is 14.98 points above the measured market median for reviews (81.78 versus 66.8). Its technical seo score is 16.67 points below the measured market median (83.33 versus 100). Observed review volume is 160 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add clear primary headings on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
41.43 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -21.88 points
Market Position: 17.86th percentile
Local Visibility
80
+10 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-100 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+10.5 vs median (22.5)
PCG Law was observed at position #9 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
PCG Law is 10 points above the measured market median for local visibility (80 versus 70). Its technical seo score is 100 points below the measured market median (0 versus 100). Observed review volume is 33 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
57.55 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -5.76 points
Market Position: 39.29th percentile
Local Visibility
77.5
+7.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-19.5 vs median (22.5)
Hanson Law Office PA was observed at position #10 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Hanson Law Office PA is 7.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (77.5 versus 70). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 3 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
35.06 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -28.25 points
Market Position: 3.57th percentile
Local Visibility
50
-20 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-100 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-7.5 vs median (22.5)
Revermann Lund Ross was observed at position #11 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Revermann Lund Ross is 0.27 points above the measured market median for reviews (67.07 versus 66.8). Its technical seo score is 100 points below the measured market median (0 versus 100). Observed review volume is 15 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
65.89 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +2.58 points
Market Position: 53.57th percentile
Local Visibility
45
-25 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-5.5 vs median (22.5)
Syverson PLLC was observed at position #12 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Syverson PLLC is 16.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 33.33). Its local visibility score is 25 points below the measured market median (45 versus 70). Observed review volume is 17 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
66 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +2.69 points
Market Position: 60.71th percentile
Local Visibility
70
0 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-21.5 vs median (22.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Paul Jeddeloh Attorney was observed at position #13 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 12 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Paul Jeddeloh Attorney's reviews score is 11.78 points below the measured market median (55.02 versus 66.8). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
#14
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
Local Visibility
67.5
-2.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
+5.5 vs median (22.5)
Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law was observed at position #14 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 13 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law is 6.57 points above the measured market median for reviews (73.37 versus 66.8). Its local visibility score is 2.5 points below the measured market median (67.5 versus 70). Observed review volume is 28 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
52.42 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -10.89 points
Market Position: 25th percentile
Local Visibility
65
-5 vs market median
Technical SEO
33.33
-66.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-19.5 vs median (22.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Donohue Novak At Law was observed at position #15 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 14 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
- #1 Sandahl & Damhof
- #2 Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.
- #3 Rinke Noonan
- #4 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
- #5 Evenson Decker, P.A.
- #6 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
- #7 Kelm & Reuter, P.A.
- #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
- #9 PCG Law
- #10 Hanson Law Office PA
- #11 Revermann Lund Ross
- #12 Syverson PLLC
- #13 Paul Jeddeloh Attorney
- #14 Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law
Why This Business Differs Online
Donohue Novak At Law's technical seo score is 66.67 points below the measured market median (33.33 versus 100). Observed review volume is 3 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
60.72 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -2.59 points
Market Position: 46.43th percentile
Local Visibility
25
-45 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+83.5 vs median (22.5)
Toepfer at Law, PLLC was observed at position #16 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 15 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
- #1 Sandahl & Damhof
- #2 Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.
- #3 Rinke Noonan
- #4 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
- #5 Evenson Decker, P.A.
- #6 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
- #7 Kelm & Reuter, P.A.
- #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
- #9 PCG Law
- #10 Hanson Law Office PA
- #11 Revermann Lund Ross
- #12 Syverson PLLC
- #13 Paul Jeddeloh Attorney
- #14 Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law
- #15 Donohue Novak At Law
Why This Business Differs Online
Toepfer at Law, PLLC is 13.02 points above the measured market median for reviews (79.82 versus 66.8). Its local visibility score is 45 points below the measured market median (25 versus 70). Observed review volume is 106 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Local Visibility
60
-10 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-12.5 vs median (22.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Lathrop GPM LLP was observed at position #17 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 16 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
- #1 Sandahl & Damhof
- #2 Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.
- #3 Rinke Noonan
- #4 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
- #5 Evenson Decker, P.A.
- #6 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
- #7 Kelm & Reuter, P.A.
- #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
- #9 PCG Law
- #10 Hanson Law Office PA
- #11 Revermann Lund Ross
- #12 Syverson PLLC
- #13 Paul Jeddeloh Attorney
- #14 Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law
- #15 Donohue Novak At Law
- #16 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
Why This Business Differs Online
Lathrop GPM LLP's local visibility score is 10 points below the measured market median (60 versus 70). Observed review volume is 10 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Local Visibility
57.5
-12.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-13.5 vs median (22.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
RGP Law Ltd. was observed at position #18 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 17 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
- #1 Sandahl & Damhof
- #2 Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.
- #3 Rinke Noonan
- #4 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
- #5 Evenson Decker, P.A.
- #6 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
- #7 Kelm & Reuter, P.A.
- #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
- #9 PCG Law
- #10 Hanson Law Office PA
- #11 Revermann Lund Ross
- #12 Syverson PLLC
- #13 Paul Jeddeloh Attorney
- #14 Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law
- #15 Donohue Novak At Law
- #16 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
- #17 Lathrop GPM LLP
Why This Business Differs Online
RGP Law Ltd.'s local visibility score is 12.5 points below the measured market median (57.5 versus 70). Observed review volume is 9 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
#19
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
54.25 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -9.06 points
Market Position: 32.14th percentile
Local Visibility
55
-15 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-21.5 vs median (22.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.: Bradley W. Hanson was observed at position #19 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 18 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
- #1 Sandahl & Damhof
- #2 Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.
- #3 Rinke Noonan
- #4 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
- #5 Evenson Decker, P.A.
- #6 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
- #7 Kelm & Reuter, P.A.
- #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
- #9 PCG Law
- #10 Hanson Law Office PA
- #11 Revermann Lund Ross
- #12 Syverson PLLC
- #13 Paul Jeddeloh Attorney
- #14 Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law
- #15 Donohue Novak At Law
- #16 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
- #17 Lathrop GPM LLP
- #18 RGP Law Ltd.
Why This Business Differs Online
Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.: Bradley W. Hanson's entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
35.14 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -28.17 points
Market Position: 10.71th percentile
Local Visibility
5
-65 vs market median
Technical SEO
50
-50 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-14.5 vs median (22.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Lund Ross, P.A. Law Firm was observed at position #20 for the "Estate Planning Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 19 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
- #1 Sandahl & Damhof
- #2 Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.
- #3 Rinke Noonan
- #4 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
- #5 Evenson Decker, P.A.
- #6 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
- #7 Kelm & Reuter, P.A.
- #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
- #9 PCG Law
- #10 Hanson Law Office PA
- #11 Revermann Lund Ross
- #12 Syverson PLLC
- #13 Paul Jeddeloh Attorney
- #14 Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law
- #15 Donohue Novak At Law
- #16 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
- #17 Lathrop GPM LLP
- #18 RGP Law Ltd.
- #19 Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.: Bradley W. Hanson
Why This Business Differs Online
Lund Ross, P.A. Law Firm's local visibility score is 65 points below the measured market median (5 versus 70). Observed review volume is 8 versus a market median of 22.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards
Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.
Highest Observed Local Visibility Scores
Market Median: 70 · Average: 68.63 · Range: 5–100 (20 measured)
70
70
57.5
45
Service × Location Content Detection Matrix
Observed coverage of essential service and location content on sampled official websites.
| Detected Content Check | Donohue Novak At Law | Hanson Law Office PA | Sam V. Calvert Attorney at Law | Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A.: Bradley W. Hanson | Rinke Noonan | Lund Ross, P.A. Law Firm | Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes | Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A. | Reichert Wenner, P.A. | Lathrop GPM LLP | Kelm & Reuter, P.A. | RGP Law Ltd. | Sandahl & Damhof | Revermann Lund Ross | Toepfer at Law, PLLC | Evenson Decker, P.A. | Heller & Thyen, P.A. | PCG Law | Syverson PLLC | Paul Jeddeloh Attorney |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service content 14 measured | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | — | — | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] |
| Location content 14 measured | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | — | — | — | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | — | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] |
| Service and location coverage 14 measured | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | — | — | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] |
| Relevant FAQs 14 measured | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | — | — | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] |
Snapshot Provenance & Methodology Disclosure
Snapshot ID: 4b9b5687-c323-4977-a4c7-5a5e3120d3dd · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-29 02:04 UTC · Published: 2026-09-29 02:04 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0
This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.
View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
- Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
- Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
- Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
- Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
- Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
- Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
- Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
- Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
- The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
- Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
- Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
- Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
- Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
- Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
- Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
- Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.