This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.
Search captured: concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN
Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN”.
Concrete & Foundation Contractors in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility
Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for concrete & foundation contractors providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.
🏢 12 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 63.08/100⭐ Median Reviews: 3.5📡 379 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:
City map view · St. Cloud, MN
These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.
Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 12
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
12 mapped businesses shown.
Top 4 side by side
Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.
“I like the guys here. They do good work. Lyon is their parent company. My favorite thing to do here was building the wonder walks for the older folks in the r…”Joseph McGuire · Google listing
“Hageman Homes did an excellent job on my 56’ x 36’ pole shed pad. Communication was easy throughout the entire process and they were great to work with. They…”Dan Carlson · Google listing
“KUDDOS to Dunrite Concrete out of Avon, Minnesota on a job well done! From our first conversation to the finished product, Nick was quick with responses, (act…”Cynthia Trettel · Google listing
Local Visibility: +16.25 above market median (100 vs 83.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -33.33 below market median (50 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Concrete Inc was observed at position #1 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Concrete Inc is 16.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (100 versus 83.75). Its technical seo score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (50 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 2 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add clear primary headings on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add clear primary headings on sampled pages[1][2]
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (25 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Hageman Homes LLC was observed at position #2 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
Hageman Homes LLC is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (25 versus 0). Observed review volume is 25 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Reviews: +15.2 above market median (73.52 vs 58.32)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Dun Rite Concrete Service was observed at position #3 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Dun Rite Concrete Service is 15.2 points above the measured market median for reviews (73.52 versus 58.32). Observed review volume is 33 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment.[1][2][3]
Content Coverage: +75 above market median (75 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -58.32 below market median (0 vs 58.32)[1][2]
Concrete Contractor in St. Cloud, MN | DRSC Concrete Inc was observed at position #4 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Concrete Contractor in St. Cloud, MN | DRSC Concrete Inc is 75 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 0). Its reviews score is 58.32 points below the measured market median (0 versus 58.32). Observed review volume is 0 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -3.75 below market median (80 vs 83.75)[1][2]
K Johnson Construction was observed at position #5 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
K Johnson Construction is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its local visibility score is 3.75 points below the measured market median (80 versus 83.75). Observed review volume is 4 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility: +3.75 above market median (87.5 vs 83.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Cemstone Supply was observed at position #6 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Cemstone Supply is 3.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (87.5 versus 83.75). Observed review volume is 11 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment.[1][2][3]
Local Visibility: +1.25 above market median (85 vs 83.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Andrews Concrete Works Inc was observed at position #7 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Andrews Concrete Works Inc is 1.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (85 versus 83.75). Its local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 3 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Connect the official website to the local profile[1][2]
Reviews: +20.14 above market median (78.46 vs 58.32)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Resch Enterprises was observed at position #8 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Resch Enterprises is 20.14 points above the measured market median for reviews (78.46 versus 58.32). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 50 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Reviews: -43.3 below market median (15.02 vs 58.32)[1][2]
Mehrwerth Concrete & Masonry Inc. was observed at position #9 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Mehrwerth Concrete & Masonry Inc.'s reviews score is 43.3 points below the measured market median (15.02 versus 58.32). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Central MN Concrete Co was observed at position #10 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Central MN Concrete Co's entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 3 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -8.75 below market median (75 vs 83.75)[1][2]
Landwehr Construction Inc was observed at position #11 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Landwehr Construction Inc is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its local visibility score is 8.75 points below the measured market median (75 versus 83.75). Observed review volume is 19 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (25 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -11.25 below market median (72.5 vs 83.75)[1][2]
Central Minnesota Community Foundation was observed at position #12 for the "concrete foundation in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's November 3, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Central Minnesota Community Foundation is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (25 versus 0). Its local visibility score is 11.25 points below the measured market median (72.5 versus 83.75). Observed review volume is 2 versus a market median of 3.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards
Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.
Snapshot ID: db50fd23-5956-4118-8c80-7c91d1618756 · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-11-03 22:50 UTC · Published: 2026-11-03 22:50 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0
This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.
View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.
™