Skip to content
For ResidentsFor Business Owners
Purpose-built comparison

Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN

This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.

Search captured: Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN

Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN”.

Family Law Attorneys in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility

Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for family law attorneys providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.

🏢 20 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 68.02/100⭐ Median Reviews: 47📡 631 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:

City map view · St. Cloud, MN

These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.

Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 20
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
20 mapped businesses shown.

Top 4 side by side

Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.

The rest of this comparison

Open NextDoorScore factor analysis for every listing
83.22 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +15.2 points
Market Position: 96.43th percentile
Local Visibility
100
+23.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+59 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Toepfer at Law, PLLC was observed at position #1 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online

Toepfer at Law, PLLC is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Observed review volume is 106 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
77.5 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +9.48 points
Market Position: 89.29th percentile
Local Visibility
97.5
+21.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+52 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +21.25 above market median (97.5 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes was observed at position #2 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
Why This Business Differs Online

Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes is 21.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (97.5 versus 76.25). Observed review volume is 99 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility
95
+18.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-11 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +18.75 above market median (95 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -1.79 below market median (70.14 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Reichert Wenner, P.A. was observed at position #3 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
Why This Business Differs Online

Reichert Wenner, P.A. is 18.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (95 versus 76.25). Its reviews score is 1.79 points below the measured market median (70.14 versus 71.93). Observed review volume is 36 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
74.3 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +6.28 points
Market Position: 82.14th percentile
Local Visibility
92.5
+16.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+39 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik was observed at position #4 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
Why This Business Differs Online

Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 86 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
#5
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
43.43 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -24.59 points
Market Position: 10.71th percentile
Local Visibility
90
+13.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-83.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-14 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +13.75 above market median (90 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -83.33 below market median (0 vs 83.33)[1][2]
PCG Law was observed at position #5 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
Why This Business Differs Online

PCG Law is 13.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (90 versus 76.25). Its technical seo score is 83.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 33 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
#6
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
68.02 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: 0 points
Market Position: 53.57th percentile
Local Visibility
87.5
+11.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-10 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +11.25 above market median (87.5 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -4.6 below market median (67.33 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Rinke Noonan was observed at position #6 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
Why This Business Differs Online

Rinke Noonan is 11.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (87.5 versus 76.25). Its reviews score is 4.6 points below the measured market median (67.33 versus 71.93). Observed review volume is 37 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
60.53 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -7.49 points
Market Position: 17.86th percentile
Local Visibility
85
+8.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-16.66 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+2 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +8.75 above market median (85 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Migala Law Office was observed at position #7 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
  6. #6 Rinke Noonan
Why This Business Differs Online

Migala Law Office is 8.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (85 versus 76.25). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 49 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
69.18 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +1.16 points
Market Position: 60.71th percentile
Local Visibility
82.5
+6.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+113 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +9.85 above market median (81.78 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Heller & Thyen, P.A. was observed at position #8 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
  6. #6 Rinke Noonan
  7. #7 Migala Law Office
Why This Business Differs Online

Heller & Thyen, P.A. is 9.85 points above the measured market median for reviews (81.78 versus 71.93). Observed review volume is 160 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility
80
+3.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-5 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +3.75 above market median (80 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -5.71 below market median (66.22 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Evenson Decker, P.A. was observed at position #9 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
  6. #6 Rinke Noonan
  7. #7 Migala Law Office
  8. #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
Why This Business Differs Online

Evenson Decker, P.A. is 3.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (80 versus 76.25). Its reviews score is 5.71 points below the measured market median (66.22 versus 71.93). Observed review volume is 42 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
62.16 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -5.86 points
Market Position: 25th percentile
Local Visibility
77.5
+1.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+13 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Abedi Hanson Sletten PLLC was observed at position #10 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
  6. #6 Rinke Noonan
  7. #7 Migala Law Office
  8. #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
  9. #9 Evenson Decker, P.A.
Why This Business Differs Online

Abedi Hanson Sletten PLLC is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 60 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
68.01 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -0.01 points
Market Position: 46.43th percentile
Local Visibility
75
-1.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+296 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +20.35 above market median (92.28 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
LifeBack Law Firm, P.A. was observed at position #11 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
  6. #6 Rinke Noonan
  7. #7 Migala Law Office
  8. #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
  9. #9 Evenson Decker, P.A.
  10. #10 Abedi Hanson Sletten PLLC
Why This Business Differs Online

LifeBack Law Firm, P.A. is 20.35 points above the measured market median for reviews (92.28 versus 71.93). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 343 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
66.63 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -1.39 points
Market Position: 32.14th percentile
Local Visibility
72.5
-3.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+16 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +6.17 above market median (78.1 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -3.75 below market median (72.5 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Attorney Justin Braulick was observed at position #12 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
  6. #6 Rinke Noonan
  7. #7 Migala Law Office
  8. #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
  9. #9 Evenson Decker, P.A.
  10. #10 Abedi Hanson Sletten PLLC
  11. #11 LifeBack Law Firm, P.A.
Why This Business Differs Online

Attorney Justin Braulick is 6.17 points above the measured market median for reviews (78.1 versus 71.93). Its local visibility score is 3.75 points below the measured market median (72.5 versus 76.25). Observed review volume is 63 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Local Visibility
40
-36.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
+30 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -36.25 below market median (40 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Kelm & Reuter, P.A. was observed at position #13 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 12 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
  6. #6 Rinke Noonan
  7. #7 Migala Law Office
  8. #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
  9. #9 Evenson Decker, P.A.
  10. #10 Abedi Hanson Sletten PLLC
  11. #11 LifeBack Law Firm, P.A.
  12. #12 Attorney Justin Braulick
Why This Business Differs Online

Kelm & Reuter, P.A.'s local visibility score is 36.25 points below the measured market median (40 versus 76.25). Observed review volume is 77 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Local Visibility
67.5
-8.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-40 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -12.88 below market median (59.05 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Lund Law & Mediation Center was observed at position #14 for the "Family Law Attorney in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 13 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Toepfer at Law, PLLC
  2. #2 Jeddeloh Snyder Stommes
  3. #3 Reichert Wenner, P.A.
  4. #4 Attorney Alexander Michael Gutnik
  5. #5 PCG Law
  6. #6 Rinke Noonan
  7. #7 Migala Law Office
  8. #8 Heller & Thyen, P.A.
  9. #9 Evenson Decker, P.A.
  10. #10 Abedi Hanson Sletten PLLC
  11. #11 LifeBack Law Firm, P.A.
  12. #12 Attorney Justin Braulick
  13. #13 Kelm & Reuter, P.A.
Why This Business Differs Online

Lund Law & Mediation Center's reviews score is 12.88 points below the measured market median (59.05 versus 71.93). Observed review volume is 7 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
72.5 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +4.48 points
Market Position: 67.86th percentile
Local Visibility
65
-11.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-46 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -16.91 below market median (55.02 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Gerald Hasselbrink Law Office is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its reviews score is 16.91 points below the measured market median (55.02 versus 71.93). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
73.55 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +5.53 points
Market Position: 75th percentile
Local Visibility
62.5
-13.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-38 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -23.26 below market median (48.67 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Buchin Law Office is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its reviews score is 23.26 points below the measured market median (48.67 versus 71.93). Observed review volume is 9 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Local Visibility
60
-16.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-40 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Kay Snyder Attorney's local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 7 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Connect the official website to the local profile[1][2]
Local Visibility
15
-61.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-2 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +1.78 above market median (73.71 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -61.25 below market median (15 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Lindstrom Family Law is 1.78 points above the measured market median for reviews (73.71 versus 71.93). Its local visibility score is 61.25 points below the measured market median (15 versus 76.25). Observed review volume is 45 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
#19
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
28.99 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -39.03 points
Market Position: 3.57th percentile
Local Visibility
10
-66.25 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-83.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+47 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +8.03 above market median (79.96 vs 71.93)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -83.33 below market median (0 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Olson Law LLC is 8.03 points above the measured market median for reviews (79.96 versus 71.93). Its technical seo score is 83.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 94 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
#20
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
67.05 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -0.97 points
Market Position: 39.29th percentile
Local Visibility
52.5
-23.75 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-30 vs median (47)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -23.75 below market median (52.5 vs 76.25)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Gierman Law is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 23.75 points below the measured market median (52.5 versus 76.25). Observed review volume is 17 versus a market median of 47; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]

Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards

Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.

Service × Location Content Detection Matrix

Observed coverage of essential service and location content on sampled official websites.

Detected Content CheckLund Law & Mediation CenterKay Snyder AttorneyOlson Law LLCRinke NoonanAttorney Justin BraulickJeddeloh Snyder StommesReichert Wenner, P.A.Attorney Alexander Michael GutnikKelm & Reuter, P.A.Gerald Hasselbrink Law OfficeMigala Law OfficeBuchin Law OfficeAbedi Hanson Sletten PLLCLifeBack Law Firm, P.A.Toepfer at Law, PLLCGierman LawLindstrom Family LawEvenson Decker, P.A.Heller & Thyen, P.A.PCG Law
Service content
14 measured
——✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]——✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]
Location content
14 measured
——✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]——✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]
Service and location coverage
14 measured
——✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]——✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]
Relevant FAQs
14 measured
——✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]——✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]

Snapshot Provenance & Methodology Disclosure

Snapshot ID: 5ecfe76d-6420-4dde-bd76-314b100b632e · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-29 02:02 UTC · Published: 2026-09-29 02:02 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0

This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.

View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
  • Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
  • Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
  • Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
  • Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
  • Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
  • Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
  • Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
  • Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
  • The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
  • Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
  • Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
  • Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
  • Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
  • Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
  • Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
  • Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.

Related services in St. Cloud

All family law attorneys comparisons · All local comparisons · How scores work · Own one of these businesses? Claim your free listing