This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.
Search captured: gym in st cloud mn
Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: โGym in St. Cloud, MNโ.
Gyms in St. Cloud, MN โ compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility
Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for gyms providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.
๐ข 19 Providers Analyzed๐ฏ Market Median Score: 62.11/100โญ Median Reviews: 114๐ก 731 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:
City map view ยท St. Cloud, MN
These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only โ it is not a score.
Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 19
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
19 mapped businesses shown.
Top 4 side by side
Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.
Local Visibility: +27.5 above market median (100 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Crunch Fitness - St. Cloud was observed at position #1 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Crunch Fitness - St. Cloud is 27.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (100 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 239 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -33.33 below market median (50 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Lion's Fitness was observed at position #2 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
Lion's Fitness is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its technical seo score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (50 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 267 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: +22.5 above market median (95 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Planet Fitness was observed at position #3 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Planet Fitness is 22.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (95 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 609 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment.[1][2][3]
Local Visibility: +20 above market median (92.5 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -16.66 below market median (66.67 vs 83.33)[1][2]
St. Cloud Area Family YMCA was observed at position #4 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
St. Cloud Area Family YMCA is 20 points above the measured market median for local visibility (92.5 versus 72.5). Its technical seo score is 16.66 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 937 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add descriptions to sampled pages with missing descriptions.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add descriptions to sampled pages with missing descriptions[1][2]
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Sta-Fit was observed at position #5 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Sta-Fit is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 364 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add current contact information to the local profile.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add current contact information to the local profile[1][2]
Local Visibility: +2.5 above market median (75 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -83.33 below market median (0 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Anytime Fitness was observed at position #6 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Anytime Fitness is 2.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (75 versus 72.5). Its technical seo score is 83.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 181 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +20.83 above market median (33.33 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -0.12 below market median (82.34 vs 82.46)[1][2]
Downtown Gym & Fitness was observed at position #7 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Downtown Gym & Fitness is 20.83 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (33.33 versus 12.5). Its reviews score is 0.12 points below the measured market median (82.34 versus 82.46). First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility: +7.5 above market median (80 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -16.6 below market median (65.86 vs 82.46)[1][2]
Burn and Build Fitness - St Cloud, MN was observed at position #9 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Burn and Build Fitness - St Cloud, MN is 7.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (80 versus 72.5). Its reviews score is 16.6 points below the measured market median (65.86 versus 82.46). Observed review volume is 26 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Local Visibility: +5 above market median (77.5 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -12.5 below market median (0 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Peak Physique St. Cloud was observed at position #10 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Peak Physique St. Cloud is 5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (77.5 versus 72.5). Its entity consistency score is 12.5 points below the measured market median (0 versus 12.5). Observed review volume is 82 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +37.5 above market median (50 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -22.5 below market median (50 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Omni Training Facility was observed at position #11 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Omni Training Facility is 37.5 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 12.5). Its local visibility score is 22.5 points below the measured market median (50 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 50 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +62.5 above market median (75 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
HybridX Fitness was observed at position #12 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
HybridX Fitness is 62.5 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 12.5). Observed review volume is 103 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Technical SEO: -83.33 below market median (0 vs 83.33)[1][2]
The Club-Total Fitness and Racquetball was observed at position #13 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
The Club-Total Fitness and Racquetball's technical seo score is 83.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 56 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -37.5 below market median (35 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Granite City Athletics & Fitness was observed at position #14 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 12 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Granite City Athletics & Fitness is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (50 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 37.5 points below the measured market median (35 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 102 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Content Coverage: +75 above market median (100 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -42.5 below market median (30 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Orangetheory Fitness was observed at position #15 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 13 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Orangetheory Fitness is 75 points above the measured market median for content coverage (100 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 42.5 points below the measured market median (30 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 198 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -47.5 below market median (25 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Snap Fitness St. Joseph was observed at position #16 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 14 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Snap Fitness St. Joseph is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (50 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 47.5 points below the measured market median (25 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 39 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +37.5 above market median (50 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -52.5 below market median (20 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Rejuv Medical was observed at position #17 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 15 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Rejuv Medical is 37.5 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 12.5). Its local visibility score is 52.5 points below the measured market median (20 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 298 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +20.83 above market median (33.33 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -57.5 below market median (15 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Rejuv Fitness was observed at position #18 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 16 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Rejuv Fitness is 20.83 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (33.33 versus 12.5). Its local visibility score is 57.5 points below the measured market median (15 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 13 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -62.5 below market median (10 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Snap Fitness St. Augusta was observed at position #19 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 17 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Snap Fitness St. Augusta is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (50 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 62.5 points below the measured market median (10 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 26 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Technical SEO: -33.33 below market median (50 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Whitney Recreation Center was observed at position #20 for the "Gym in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 18 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Whitney Recreation Center's technical seo score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (50 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 153 versus a market median of 114; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards
Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.
Snapshot ID: 6285b9d0-0ba0-45e6-a0ee-6dc4eef60258 ยท Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-29 01:15 UTC ยท Published: 2026-09-29 01:15 UTC ยท Methodology Version: 1.1.0
This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.
View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0โ100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 ร 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 ร 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) ร 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) ร 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 ร (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.