This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.
⚠ Cleaning
Search captured: house cleaning in st cloud mn
Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN”.
House Cleaning Services in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility
Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for house cleaning services providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.
🏢 10 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 60.53/100⭐ Median Reviews: 14📡 330 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:
City map view · St. Cloud, MN
These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.
Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 7
Unmapped businesses: 3
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
7 mapped businesses shown · 3 unmapped.
Top 4 side by side
Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.
“Jessica and Jessica have done a phenomenal job; High quality and thorough cleaning. Extremely easy to communicate with, both in person and to set up cleaning t…”Cari · Google listing
“Trust and a peace of mind! Greta, Jim and their team provide exceptional cleaning services and are easy to work with. Greta took time to listen to our indivi…”Melanie & Brady Engen · Google listing
“Excellent service! We hired for a Deep Clean after a difficult year. The 3 ladies not only cleaned very well, but they were also kind and down to Earth. I will…”Amanda Mc · Google listing
“Daniel and crew did an incredible job with both my carpets, as well as my bathroom and shower tile. The work was done professionally at a great value. I’ll def…”Alan Wood · Google listing
Local Visibility: +11.25 above market median (100 vs 88.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -33.34 below market median (33.33 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Jessica's Cleaning L.L.C was observed at position #1 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Jessica's Cleaning L.L.C is 11.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (100 versus 88.75). Its technical seo score is 33.34 points below the measured market median (33.33 versus 66.67). Observed review volume is 8 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +50 above market median (50 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Weisman Cleaning Inc was observed at position #2 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
Weisman Cleaning Inc is 50 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 0). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 34 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
Reviews: +16.25 above market median (85.22 vs 68.97)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -16.67 below market median (50 vs 66.67)[1][2]
St.Cloud Maids was observed at position #3 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
St.Cloud Maids is 16.25 points above the measured market median for reviews (85.22 versus 68.97). Its technical seo score is 16.67 points below the measured market median (50 versus 66.67). Observed review volume is 148 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: +3.75 above market median (92.5 vs 88.75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
DMS Cleaning Service, LLC was observed at position #4 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
DMS Cleaning Service, LLC is 3.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (92.5 versus 88.75). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 20 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
MaidPro of Kissimmee & St. Cloud was observed at position #5 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
MaidPro of Kissimmee & St. Cloud is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (50 versus 25). Observed review volume is 132 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Shiny Reflection Cleaning Services was observed at position #6 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Shiny Reflection Cleaning Services's local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Connect the official website to the local profile[1][2]
Reviews: -8.94 below market median (60.03 vs 68.97)[1][2]
Kend Luxurious Cleaning LLC was observed at position #7 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Kend Luxurious Cleaning LLC's reviews score is 8.94 points below the measured market median (60.03 versus 68.97). Observed review volume is 3 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Reviews: -68.97 below market median (0 vs 68.97)[1][2]
Sunrise Cleaning LLC was observed at position #8 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Sunrise Cleaning LLC's reviews score is 68.97 points below the measured market median (0 versus 68.97). Observed review volume is 0 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Reviews: -68.97 below market median (0 vs 68.97)[1][2]
Revive & Restore Cleaning Services was observed at position #9 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Revive & Restore Cleaning Services's reviews score is 68.97 points below the measured market median (0 versus 68.97). Observed review volume is 0 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +75 above market median (75 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -16.67 below market median (50 vs 66.67)[1][2]
Apex Cleaning Services was observed at position #10 for the "cleaning house cleaning in in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's October 2, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Apex Cleaning Services is 75 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 0). Its technical seo score is 16.67 points below the measured market median (50 versus 66.67). Observed review volume is 105 versus a market median of 14; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards
Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.
Snapshot ID: 0ebaa89b-63a7-40c7-9a3a-9701131a7528 · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-10-02 03:03 UTC · Published: 2026-10-02 03:03 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0
This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.
View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.
™