™
#1
Tiny Hearts Studio
St. Cloud, MN
81.3 Score—— Reviews
Local position: #1 of 13
Claim this businessView your private optimization opportunities.Purpose-built comparison
Photographer in St. Cloud, MN
This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.
Search captured: photographer in st cloud mn
Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “Photographer in St. Cloud, MN”.
Photographers in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility
Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for photographers providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.
🏢 13 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 69.22/100⭐ Median Reviews: 35📡 427 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:
City map view · St. Cloud, MN
These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.
13 mapped businesses shown.
Top 4 side by side
Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.
#2
Todd Myra Photography
St. Cloud, MN
81.6 Score—— Reviews
Local position: #2 of 13
Claim this businessView your private optimization opportunities.
#3
Lovely Day Fleur
St. Cloud, MN
69.1 Score—— Reviews
Local position: #3 of 13
Claim this businessView your private optimization opportunities.
#4
Sv Photography
St. Cloud, MN
74.6 Score—— Reviews
Local position: #4 of 13
Claim this businessView your private optimization opportunities.The rest of this comparison
| Rank | Business | Rating | Google listing quote | Local Pulse | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #5 | Stylized Image Photography | — | — | Profile | |
| #6 | Advent Imaging | — | — | Profile | |
| #7 | 360 Real Estate Image LLC. | — | — | Profile | |
| #8 | Alison Hauck Portraits & Design, LLC | — | — | Profile | |
| #9 | Samantha Nesse Photography | — | — | Profile | |
| #10 | The Camera Shop | — | — | Profile | |
| #11 | YuppyPhoto, LLC | — | — | Profile | |
| #12 | Blossoms Photography LLC | — | — | Profile | |
| #13 | Nesse Collective - PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO RENTAL | — | — | Profile |
Open NextDoorScore factor analysis for every listing
81.27 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +12.05 points
Market Position: 85th percentile
Local Visibility
100
+15 vs market median
Technical SEO
50
-25 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+286 vs median (35)
Tiny Hearts Studio was observed at position #1 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Tiny Hearts Studio is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its technical seo score is 25 points below the measured market median (50 versus 75). Observed review volume is 321 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
81.59 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +12.37 points
Market Position: 95th percentile
Local Visibility
95
+10 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+25 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+89 vs median (35)
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Todd Myra Photography was observed at position #2 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Todd Myra Photography is 25 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 50). Observed review volume is 124 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
69.14 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -0.08 points
Market Position: 45th percentile
Local Visibility
90
+5 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-8.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+6 vs median (35)
Lovely Day Fleur was observed at position #3 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Lovely Day Fleur is 25 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 50). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 41 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]
74.64 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +5.42 points
Market Position: 65th percentile
Local Visibility
85
0 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+25 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
0 vs median (35)
Sv Photography was observed at position #4 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Local Visibility
90
+5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-29 vs median (35)
Stylized Image Photography was observed at position #5 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Stylized Image Photography is 5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (90 versus 85). Its reviews score is 11.86 points below the measured market median (64.08 versus 75.94). Observed review volume is 6 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]
67.19 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -2.03 points
Market Position: 35th percentile
Local Visibility
87.5
+2.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-8.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-25 vs median (35)
Advent Imaging was observed at position #6 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Advent Imaging is 25 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 50). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 10 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]
79.59 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +10.37 points
Market Position: 75th percentile
Local Visibility
85
0 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+25 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+73 vs median (35)
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
360 Real Estate Image LLC. was observed at position #7 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
360 Real Estate Image LLC. is 25 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 50). Observed review volume is 108 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
#8
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
54.17 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -15.05 points
Market Position: 15th percentile
Local Visibility
82.5
-2.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
33.33
-41.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-28 vs median (35)
Alison Hauck Portraits & Design, LLC was observed at position #8 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Alison Hauck Portraits & Design, LLC is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its entity consistency score is 50 points below the measured market median (0 versus 50). Observed review volume is 7 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Local Visibility
80
-5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
+6 vs median (35)
Samantha Nesse Photography was observed at position #9 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Samantha Nesse Photography is 1.11 points above the measured market median for reviews (77.05 versus 75.94). Its local visibility score is 5 points below the measured market median (80 versus 85). Observed review volume is 41 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
66.7 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -2.52 points
Market Position: 25th percentile
Local Visibility
77.5
-7.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
+8.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+50 vs median (35)
The Camera Shop was observed at position #10 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
The Camera Shop is 8.33 points above the measured market median for technical seo (83.33 versus 75). Its entity consistency score is 25 points below the measured market median (25 versus 50). Observed review volume is 85 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
46.55 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -22.67 points
Market Position: 5th percentile
Local Visibility
75
-10 vs market median
Technical SEO
33.33
-41.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-27 vs median (35)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
YuppyPhoto, LLC was observed at position #11 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
YuppyPhoto, LLC's entity consistency score is 50 points below the measured market median (0 versus 50). Observed review volume is 8 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Local Visibility
72.5
-12.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-31 vs median (35)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Blossoms Photography LLC was observed at position #12 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Blossoms Photography LLC's local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 4 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]
#13
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
69.29 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +0.07 points
Market Position: 55th percentile
Local Visibility
70
-15 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+25 vs market median
Content Coverage
100
+75 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-23 vs median (35)
Nesse Collective - PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO RENTAL was observed at position #13 for the "Photographer in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 12 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Nesse Collective - PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO RENTAL is 75 points above the measured market median for content coverage (100 versus 25). Its entity consistency score is 50 points below the measured market median (0 versus 50). Observed review volume is 12 versus a market median of 35; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards
Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.
Highest Observed Local Visibility Scores
Market Median: 85 · Average: 83.85 · Range: 70–100 (13 measured)
90
90
87.5
85
85
77.5
Service × Location Content Detection Matrix
Observed coverage of essential service and location content on sampled official websites.
| Detected Content Check | Stylized Image Photography | Samantha Nesse Photography | Tiny Hearts Studio | Nesse Collective - PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO RENTAL | Blossoms Photography LLC | Todd Myra Photography | Sv Photography | The Camera Shop | Alison Hauck Portraits & Design, LLC | YuppyPhoto, LLC | Lovely Day Fleur | 360 Real Estate Image LLC. | Advent Imaging |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service content 10 measured | — | — | ✓ Detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | — | ✓ Detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] |
| Location content 10 measured | — | — | ✓ Detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] |
| Service and location coverage 10 measured | — | — | ✓ Detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] |
| Relevant FAQs 10 measured | — | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✓ Detected[1] | — | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] | ✗ Not detected[1] |
Snapshot Provenance & Methodology Disclosure
Snapshot ID: b525f977-2409-4385-a84b-a6fbdaeb9994 · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-29 01:05 UTC · Published: 2026-09-29 01:05 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0
This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.
View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
- Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
- Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
- Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
- Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
- Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
- Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
- Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
- Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
- The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
- Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
- Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
- Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
- Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
- Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
- Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
- Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.