Skip to content
For ResidentsFor Business Owners
Purpose-built comparison

Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN

This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.

Search captured: plastic surgeon in st cloud mn

Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN”.

Plastic Surgeons in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility

Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for plastic surgeons providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.

🏢 19 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 60.32/100⭐ Median Reviews: 112📡 577 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:

City map view · St. Cloud, MN

These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.

Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 19
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
19 mapped businesses shown.

Top 4 side by side

Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.

The rest of this comparison

Open NextDoorScore factor analysis for every listing
Local Visibility
100
+30 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-72 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +30 above market median (100 vs 70)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -20.28 below market median (61.88 vs 82.16)[1][2]
CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery was observed at position #1 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online

CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery is 30 points above the measured market median for local visibility (100 versus 70). Its reviews score is 20.28 points below the measured market median (61.88 versus 82.16). Observed review volume is 40 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Local Visibility
97.5
+27.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-74 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +27.5 above market median (97.5 vs 70)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -8.64 below market median (73.52 vs 82.16)[1][2]
Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud was observed at position #2 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
Why This Business Differs Online

Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud is 27.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (97.5 versus 70). Its reviews score is 8.64 points below the measured market median (73.52 versus 82.16). Observed review volume is 38 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Local Visibility
95
+25 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-110 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +25 above market median (95 vs 70)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -24.21 below market median (57.95 vs 82.16)[1][2]
Thomas Satterberg, MD was observed at position #3 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
Why This Business Differs Online

Thomas Satterberg, MD is 25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (95 versus 70). Its reviews score is 24.21 points below the measured market median (57.95 versus 82.16). Observed review volume is 2 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
Local Visibility
92.5
+22.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-106 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +22.5 above market median (92.5 vs 70)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -31.08 below market median (51.08 vs 82.16)[1][2]
John Houle, MD was observed at position #4 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
Why This Business Differs Online

John Houle, MD is 22.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (92.5 versus 70). Its reviews score is 31.08 points below the measured market median (51.08 versus 82.16). Observed review volume is 6 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
74.95 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +14.63 points
Market Position: 95.83th percentile
Local Visibility
80
+10 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+228 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +25 above market median (66.67 vs 41.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN was observed at position #5 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
  4. #4 John Houle, MD
Why This Business Differs Online

Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN is 25 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (66.67 versus 41.67). Observed review volume is 340 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility
87.5
+17.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-107 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +17.5 above market median (87.5 vs 70)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -39.19 below market median (42.97 vs 82.16)[1][2]
Henry Yang, MD was observed at position #6 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
  4. #4 John Houle, MD
  5. #5 Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN
Why This Business Differs Online

Henry Yang, MD is 17.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (87.5 versus 70). Its reviews score is 39.19 points below the measured market median (42.97 versus 82.16). Observed review volume is 5 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
70.79 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +10.47 points
Market Position: 87.5th percentile
Local Visibility
70
0 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+482 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Element Dermatology was observed at position #7 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
  4. #4 John Houle, MD
  5. #5 Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN
  6. #6 Henry Yang, MD
Why This Business Differs Online

Element Dermatology is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 594 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
Local Visibility
82.5
+12.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-112 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +12.5 above market median (82.5 vs 70)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -82.16 below market median (0 vs 82.16)[1][2]
Robert Marcaccini, MD was observed at position #8 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
  4. #4 John Houle, MD
  5. #5 Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN
  6. #6 Henry Yang, MD
  7. #7 Element Dermatology
Why This Business Differs Online

Robert Marcaccini, MD is 12.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (82.5 versus 70). Its reviews score is 82.16 points below the measured market median (0 versus 82.16). Observed review volume is 0 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
40.43 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -19.89 points
Market Position: 4.17th percentile
Local Visibility
60
-10 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-83.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+245 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +7.4 above market median (89.56 vs 82.16)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -83.33 below market median (0 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Minnesota Oral & Facial Surgery was observed at position #9 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
  4. #4 John Houle, MD
  5. #5 Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN
  6. #6 Henry Yang, MD
  7. #7 Element Dermatology
  8. #8 Robert Marcaccini, MD
Why This Business Differs Online

Minnesota Oral & Facial Surgery is 7.4 points above the measured market median for reviews (89.56 versus 82.16). Its technical seo score is 83.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 357 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
70.15 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +9.83 points
Market Position: 79.17th percentile
Local Visibility
55
-15 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
50
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
0 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -15 below market median (55 vs 70)[1][2]
Chapter Aesthetic Studio was observed at position #10 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
  4. #4 John Houle, MD
  5. #5 Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN
  6. #6 Henry Yang, MD
  7. #7 Element Dermatology
  8. #8 Robert Marcaccini, MD
  9. #9 Minnesota Oral & Facial Surgery
Why This Business Differs Online

Chapter Aesthetic Studio is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (50 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 15 points below the measured market median (55 versus 70). First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
57.02 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -3.3 points
Market Position: 29.17th percentile
Local Visibility
75
+5 vs market median
Technical SEO
50
-33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+15 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +5 above market median (75 vs 70)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -33.33 below market median (50 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Midwest Clinic of Dermatology was observed at position #11 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
  4. #4 John Houle, MD
  5. #5 Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN
  6. #6 Henry Yang, MD
  7. #7 Element Dermatology
  8. #8 Robert Marcaccini, MD
  9. #9 Minnesota Oral & Facial Surgery
  10. #10 Chapter Aesthetic Studio
Why This Business Differs Online

Midwest Clinic of Dermatology is 5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (75 versus 70). Its technical seo score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (50 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 127 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility
72.5
+2.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-111 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +2.5 above market median (72.5 vs 70)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -27.14 below market median (55.02 vs 82.16)[1][2]
CentraCare – Plaza Midsota MedSpa was observed at position #12 for the "Plastic Surgeon in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 CentraCare - Midsota Plastic Surgery
  2. #2 Omni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
  3. #3 Thomas Satterberg, MD
  4. #4 John Houle, MD
  5. #5 Skin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MN
  6. #6 Henry Yang, MD
  7. #7 Element Dermatology
  8. #8 Robert Marcaccini, MD
  9. #9 Minnesota Oral & Facial Surgery
  10. #10 Chapter Aesthetic Studio
  11. #11 Midwest Clinic of Dermatology
Why This Business Differs Online

CentraCare – Plaza Midsota MedSpa is 2.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (72.5 versus 70). Its reviews score is 27.14 points below the measured market median (55.02 versus 82.16). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
65.99 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +5.67 points
Market Position: 70.83th percentile
Local Visibility
40
-30 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+457 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -30 below market median (40 vs 70)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Kayan Plastic Surgery - Dr. Tracy Kayan is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its local visibility score is 30 points below the measured market median (40 versus 70). Observed review volume is 569 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
61.43 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +1.11 points
Market Position: 62.5th percentile
Local Visibility
35
-35 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+418 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +11.26 above market median (93.42 vs 82.16)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -35 below market median (35 vs 70)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Woodbury Plastic Surgery, David Thao, MD is 11.26 points above the measured market median for reviews (93.42 versus 82.16). Its local visibility score is 35 points below the measured market median (35 versus 70). Observed review volume is 530 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
58.99 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -1.33 points
Market Position: 37.5th percentile
Local Visibility
30
-40 vs market median
Technical SEO
50
-33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+94 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +33.33 above market median (75 vs 41.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -40 below market median (30 vs 70)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Rocheford Plastic Surgery is 33.33 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 41.67). Its local visibility score is 40 points below the measured market median (30 versus 70). Observed review volume is 206 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
60.24 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -0.08 points
Market Position: 45.83th percentile
Local Visibility
25
-45 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-28 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +8.33 above market median (50 vs 41.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -45 below market median (25 vs 70)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Dr. Christine Stewart is 8.33 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 41.67). Its local visibility score is 45 points below the measured market median (25 versus 70). Observed review volume is 84 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
60.39 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +0.07 points
Market Position: 54.17th percentile
Local Visibility
20
-50 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+259 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +8.33 above market median (50 vs 41.67)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -50 below market median (20 vs 70)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Edina Plastic Surgery is 8.33 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 41.67). Its local visibility score is 50 points below the measured market median (20 versus 70). Observed review volume is 371 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
54.6 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -5.72 points
Market Position: 20.83th percentile
Local Visibility
15
-55 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-63 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -55 below market median (15 vs 70)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Midwest Facial Plastic Surgery & FACE Cosmetic Skincare is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its local visibility score is 55 points below the measured market median (15 versus 70). Observed review volume is 49 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
51.21 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -9.11 points
Market Position: 12.5th percentile
Local Visibility
10
-60 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+45 vs median (112)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +1.48 above market median (83.64 vs 82.16)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -60 below market median (10 vs 70)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Harrington Plastic Surgery and Medspa is 1.48 points above the measured market median for reviews (83.64 versus 82.16). Its local visibility score is 60 points below the measured market median (10 versus 70). Observed review volume is 157 versus a market median of 112; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]

Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards

Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.

Highest Observed Local Visibility Scores
Market Median: 70 · Average: 60.13 · Range: 10–100 (19 measured)

Service × Location Content Detection Matrix

Observed coverage of essential service and location content on sampled official websites.

Detected Content CheckHarrington Plastic Surgery and MedspaElement DermatologySkin Care Doctors, P.A., Sartell, MNMinnesota Oral & Facial SurgeryRobert Marcaccini, MDWoodbury Plastic Surgery, David Thao, MDJohn Houle, MDDr. Christine StewartRocheford Plastic SurgeryMidwest Facial Plastic Surgery & FACE Cosmetic SkincareHenry Yang, MDChapter Aesthetic StudioKayan Plastic Surgery - Dr. Tracy KayanEdina Plastic SurgeryCentraCare - Midsota Plastic SurgeryThomas Satterberg, MDCentraCare – Plaza Midsota MedSpaMidwest Clinic of DermatologyOmni Cosmetic - St. Cloud
Service content
12 measured
✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]———✗ Not detected[1]—
Location content
12 measured
✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]———✗ Not detected[1]—
Service and location coverage
12 measured
✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]———✗ Not detected[1]—
Relevant FAQs
12 measured
✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]———✗ Not detected[1]—

Snapshot Provenance & Methodology Disclosure

Snapshot ID: 4503f68b-5d41-4a6f-8438-21a61e4e2ff7 · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-29 01:09 UTC · Published: 2026-09-29 01:09 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0

This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.

View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
  • Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
  • Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
  • Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
  • Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
  • Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
  • Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
  • Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
  • Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
  • The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
  • Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
  • Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
  • Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
  • Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
  • Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
  • Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
  • Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.

Related services in St. Cloud

All plastic surgeons comparisons · All local comparisons · How scores work · Own one of these businesses? Claim your free listing