This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.
Search captured: restaurant in St. Cloud, MN
Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: βrestaurant in St. Cloud, MNβ.
Restaurants in St. Cloud, MN β compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility
Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for restaurants providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.
π’ 20 Providers Analyzedπ― Market Median Score: 63.07/100β Median Reviews: 1,049π‘ 744 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:
City map view Β· St. Cloud, MN
These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only β it is not a score.
Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 20
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
20 mapped businesses shown.
Top 4 side by side
Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.
Local Visibility: +25 above market median (100 vs 75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -58.34 below market median (0 vs 58.34)[1][2]
Olde Brick House was observed at position #1 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
Olde Brick House is 25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (100 versus 75). Its technical seo score is 58.34 points below the measured market median (0 versus 58.34). Observed review volume is 2055 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: +22.5 above market median (97.5 vs 75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -58.34 below market median (0 vs 58.34)[1][2]
The White Horse Restaurant & Bar was observed at position #2 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
The White Horse Restaurant & Bar is 22.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (97.5 versus 75). Its technical seo score is 58.34 points below the measured market median (0 versus 58.34). Observed review volume is 1240 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: +20 above market median (95 vs 75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -25.01 below market median (33.33 vs 58.34)[1][2]
Mongo's Grill was observed at position #3 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Mongo's Grill is 20 points above the measured market median for local visibility (95 versus 75). Its technical seo score is 25.01 points below the measured market median (33.33 versus 58.34). Observed review volume is 55 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Coyote Moon Grille was observed at position #4 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Coyote Moon Grille is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Observed review volume is 1100 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +50 above market median (50 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -8.34 below market median (50 vs 58.34)[1][2]
The Pickled Loon was observed at position #5 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
The Pickled Loon is 50 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 0). Its technical seo score is 8.34 points below the measured market median (50 versus 58.34). Observed review volume is 900 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: +12.5 above market median (87.5 vs 75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -58.34 below market median (0 vs 58.34)[1][2]
Boulder Tap House was observed at position #6 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Boulder Tap House is 12.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (87.5 versus 75). Its technical seo score is 58.34 points below the measured market median (0 versus 58.34). Observed review volume is 2673 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +50 above market median (50 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Granite City Food & Brewery was observed at position #7 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Granite City Food & Brewery is 50 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 0). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 1471 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Jules' Bistro was observed at position #8 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Jules' Bistro is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Observed review volume is 1003 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
RJ's American Grill was observed at position #9 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
RJ's American Grill is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Observed review volume is 905 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility: +2.5 above market median (77.5 vs 75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -25.01 below market median (33.33 vs 58.34)[1][2]
7 West TapHouse was observed at position #10 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
7 West TapHouse is 2.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (77.5 versus 75). Its technical seo score is 25.01 points below the measured market median (33.33 versus 58.34). Observed review volume is 1349 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +25 above market median (25 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -25 below market median (50 vs 75)[1][2]
Lost Times Tavern was observed at position #11 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Lost Times Tavern is 25 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (25 versus 0). Its local visibility score is 25 points below the measured market median (50 versus 75). Observed review volume is 308 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -2.5 below market median (72.5 vs 75)[1][2]
Legends Bar & Grill - St. Cloud was observed at position #12 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Legends Bar & Grill - St. Cloud is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 2.5 points below the measured market median (72.5 versus 75). Observed review volume is 628 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Reviews: +1.15 above market median (94.29 vs 93.14)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -35 below market median (40 vs 75)[1][2]
Cafe Renaissance | Mediterranean was observed at position #13 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 12 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Cafe Renaissance | Mediterranean is 1.15 points above the measured market median for reviews (94.29 versus 93.14). Its local visibility score is 35 points below the measured market median (40 versus 75). Observed review volume is 687 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Content Coverage: +75 above market median (100 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -7.5 below market median (67.5 vs 75)[1][2]
Green Mill Restaurant & Bar was observed at position #14 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 13 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Green Mill Restaurant & Bar is 75 points above the measured market median for content coverage (100 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 7.5 points below the measured market median (67.5 versus 75). Observed review volume is 1555 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Technical SEO: -58.34 below market median (0 vs 58.34)[1][2]
Anton's Restaurant | Steakhouse was observed at position #15 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 14 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Anton's Restaurant | Steakhouse's technical seo score is 58.34 points below the measured market median (0 versus 58.34). Observed review volume is 1095 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Reviews: +2.86 above market median (96 vs 93.14)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -58.34 below market median (0 vs 58.34)[1][2]
Hajime St. Cloud | Japanese was observed at position #16 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 15 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Hajime St. Cloud | Japanese is 2.86 points above the measured market median for reviews (96 versus 93.14). Its technical seo score is 58.34 points below the measured market median (0 versus 58.34). Observed review volume is 1198 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Content Coverage: +75 above market median (100 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -15 below market median (60 vs 75)[1][2]
Boil Seafood Restaurant was observed at position #17 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 16 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Boil Seafood Restaurant is 75 points above the measured market median for content coverage (100 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 15 points below the measured market median (60 versus 75). Observed review volume is 288 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +75 above market median (75 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -17.5 below market median (57.5 vs 75)[1][2]
Dolsie's Lunch Box Grille was observed at position #18 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 17 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Dolsie's Lunch Box Grille is 75 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 0). Its local visibility score is 17.5 points below the measured market median (57.5 versus 75). Observed review volume is 644 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +66.67 above market median (66.67 vs 0)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -20 below market median (55 vs 75)[1][2]
Copper Kitchen Restaurant was observed at position #19 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 18 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Copper Kitchen Restaurant is 66.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (66.67 versus 0). Its local visibility score is 20 points below the measured market median (55 versus 75). Observed review volume is 1466 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Technical SEO: +24.99 above market median (83.33 vs 58.34)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -22.5 below market median (52.5 vs 75)[1][2]
MT's on 8th was observed at position #20 for the "restaurant in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 19 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
MT's on 8th is 24.99 points above the measured market median for technical seo (83.33 versus 58.34). Its local visibility score is 22.5 points below the measured market median (52.5 versus 75). Observed review volume is 786 versus a market median of 1049; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards
Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.
Snapshot ID: b0fc819a-f4c2-41df-a8d4-58f478ce4ea6 Β· Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-24 09:37 UTC Β· Published: 2026-09-24 09:37 UTC Β· Methodology Version: 1.1.0
This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.
View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0β100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 Γ 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 Γ 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) Γ 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) Γ 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 Γ (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.