Skip to content
Purpose-built comparison

Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN

This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.

Search captured: Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN

Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: β€œTree Service in St. Cloud, MN”.

Tree Services in St. Cloud, MN β€” compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility

Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for tree services providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.

🏒 14 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 70.44/100⭐ Median Reviews: 52πŸ“‘ 547 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:

City map view Β· St. Cloud, MN

These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only β€” it is not a score.

Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 14
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
14 mapped businesses shown.

Top 4 side by side

Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.

The rest of this comparison

Open NextDoorScore factor analysis for every listing
65.39 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -5.05 points
Market Position: 32.14th percentile
Local Visibility
100
+25 vs market median
Technical SEO
33.33
-66.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+59 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (75 vs 50)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -66.67 below market median (33.33 vs 100)[1][2]
Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC was observed at position #1 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online

Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 50). Its technical seo score is 66.67 points below the measured market median (33.33 versus 100). Observed review volume is 111 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
84.6 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +14.16 points
Market Position: 89.29th percentile
Local Visibility
97.5
+22.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
100
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+7 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (100 vs 50)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -0.15 below market median (75.64 vs 75.79)[1][2]
North Central Tree Service was observed at position #2 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
Why This Business Differs Online

North Central Tree Service is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (100 versus 50). Its reviews score is 0.15 points below the measured market median (75.64 versus 75.79). Observed review volume is 59 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
79.25 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +8.81 points
Market Position: 75th percentile
Local Visibility
95
+20 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-28 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (75 vs 50)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -7.49 below market median (68.3 vs 75.79)[1][2]
Ludivig Tree Service was observed at position #3 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
Why This Business Differs Online

Ludivig Tree Service is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 50). Its reviews score is 7.49 points below the measured market median (68.3 versus 75.79). Observed review volume is 24 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
90.39 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +19.95 points
Market Position: 96.43th percentile
Local Visibility
85
+10 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
100
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+19 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (100 vs 50)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Total Control Tree Service was observed at position #4 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
  3. #3 Ludivig Tree Service
Why This Business Differs Online

Total Control Tree Service is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (100 versus 50). Observed review volume is 71 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
83.22 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +12.78 points
Market Position: 82.14th percentile
Local Visibility
90
+15 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
100
+50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-35 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (100 vs 50)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Platinum Tree Services was observed at position #5 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
  3. #3 Ludivig Tree Service
  4. #4 Total Control Tree Service
Why This Business Differs Online

Platinum Tree Services is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (100 versus 50). Its technical seo score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 17 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
73.26 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +2.82 points
Market Position: 53.57th percentile
Local Visibility
87.5
+12.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
-16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
50
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+84 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +12.5 above market median (87.5 vs 75)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -16.67 below market median (83.33 vs 100)[1][2]
New Horizons Tree Experts was observed at position #6 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
  3. #3 Ludivig Tree Service
  4. #4 Total Control Tree Service
  5. #5 Platinum Tree Services
Why This Business Differs Online

New Horizons Tree Experts is 12.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (87.5 versus 75). Its technical seo score is 16.67 points below the measured market median (83.33 versus 100). Observed review volume is 136 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
73.36 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +2.92 points
Market Position: 60.71th percentile
Local Visibility
85
+10 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-50 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-7 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +41.67 above market median (66.67 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -50 below market median (0 vs 50)[1][2]
Brother's Tree Care was observed at position #7 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
  3. #3 Ludivig Tree Service
  4. #4 Total Control Tree Service
  5. #5 Platinum Tree Services
  6. #6 New Horizons Tree Experts
Why This Business Differs Online

Brother's Tree Care is 41.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (66.67 versus 25). Its content coverage score is 50 points below the measured market median (0 versus 50). Observed review volume is 45 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
56.59 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -13.85 points
Market Position: 10.71th percentile
Local Visibility
65
-10 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-33.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-7 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +0.92 above market median (76.71 vs 75.79)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Weaver's Tree Service LLC was observed at position #8 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
  3. #3 Ludivig Tree Service
  4. #4 Total Control Tree Service
  5. #5 Platinum Tree Services
  6. #6 New Horizons Tree Experts
  7. #7 Brother's Tree Care
Why This Business Differs Online

Weaver's Tree Service LLC is 0.92 points above the measured market median for reviews (76.71 versus 75.79). Its technical seo score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 45 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
78.11 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +7.67 points
Market Position: 67.86th percentile
Local Visibility
60
-15 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
50
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+63 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -15 below market median (60 vs 75)[1][2]
Jake's Top Notch Tree Service was observed at position #9 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
  3. #3 Ludivig Tree Service
  4. #4 Total Control Tree Service
  5. #5 Platinum Tree Services
  6. #6 New Horizons Tree Experts
  7. #7 Brother's Tree Care
  8. #8 Weaver's Tree Service LLC
Why This Business Differs Online

Jake's Top Notch Tree Service is 50 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 15 points below the measured market median (60 versus 75). Observed review volume is 115 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
61.55 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -8.89 points
Market Position: 17.86th percentile
Local Visibility
55
-20 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
-16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+9 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +0.08 above market median (75.87 vs 75.79)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -25 below market median (25 vs 50)[1][2]
AAA Tree Pros was observed at position #10 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
  3. #3 Ludivig Tree Service
  4. #4 Total Control Tree Service
  5. #5 Platinum Tree Services
  6. #6 New Horizons Tree Experts
  7. #7 Brother's Tree Care
  8. #8 Weaver's Tree Service LLC
  9. #9 Jake's Top Notch Tree Service
Why This Business Differs Online

AAA Tree Pros is 0.08 points above the measured market median for reviews (75.87 versus 75.79). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (25 versus 50). Observed review volume is 61 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
67.11 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -3.33 points
Market Position: 39.29th percentile
Local Visibility
50
-25 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
50
0 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-24 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -25 below market median (50 vs 75)[1][2]
Brad Hoheisel Tree Service LLC was observed at position #11 for the "Tree Service in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Custom View Tree & Landscape LLC
  2. #2 North Central Tree Service
  3. #3 Ludivig Tree Service
  4. #4 Total Control Tree Service
  5. #5 Platinum Tree Services
  6. #6 New Horizons Tree Experts
  7. #7 Brother's Tree Care
  8. #8 Weaver's Tree Service LLC
  9. #9 Jake's Top Notch Tree Service
  10. #10 AAA Tree Pros
Why This Business Differs Online

Brad Hoheisel Tree Service LLC's local visibility score is 25 points below the measured market median (50 versus 75). Observed review volume is 28 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
#12
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
64.06 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -6.38 points
Market Position: 25th percentile
Local Visibility
45
-30 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+53 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +7.97 above market median (83.76 vs 75.79)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -30 below market median (45 vs 75)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

TreeTec is 7.97 points above the measured market median for reviews (83.76 versus 75.79). Its local visibility score is 30 points below the measured market median (45 versus 75). Observed review volume is 105 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
67.61 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -2.83 points
Market Position: 46.43th percentile
Local Visibility
40
-35 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-46 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -35 below market median (40 vs 75)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

West Suburban Tree Care is 50 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 35 points below the measured market median (40 versus 75). Observed review volume is 6 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
51.07 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -19.37 points
Market Position: 3.57th percentile
Local Visibility
35
-40 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
-16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
-25 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-43 vs median (52)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -40 below market median (35 vs 75)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Arbor Tech Tree & Landscape Inc's local visibility score is 40 points below the measured market median (35 versus 75). Observed review volume is 9 versus a market median of 52; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]

Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards

Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.

Service Γ— Location Content Detection Matrix

Observed coverage of essential service and location content on sampled official websites.

Detected Content CheckNew Horizons Tree ExpertsLudivig Tree ServiceAAA Tree ProsWest Suburban Tree CareBrother's Tree CareJake's Top Notch Tree ServiceTreeTecArbor Tech Tree & Landscape IncCustom View Tree & Landscape LLCTotal Control Tree ServicePlatinum Tree ServicesWeaver's Tree Service LLCNorth Central Tree ServiceBrad Hoheisel Tree Service LLC
Service content
14 measured
βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]
Location content
14 measured
βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]
Service and location coverage
14 measured
βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]
Relevant FAQs
14 measured
βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ— Not detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]βœ“ Detected[1]

Snapshot Provenance & Methodology Disclosure

Snapshot ID: a3ce94d7-36f4-451b-a0c0-c20a140c374d Β· Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-24 09:43 UTC Β· Published: 2026-09-24 09:43 UTC Β· Methodology Version: 1.1.0

This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.

View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
  • Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
  • Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
  • Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
  • Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
  • Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
  • Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
  • Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
  • Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
  • The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
  • Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
  • Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 Γ— 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 Γ— 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
  • Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) Γ— 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) Γ— 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
  • Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
  • Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 Γ— (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
  • Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
  • Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.