This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.
Search captured: wedding venue in st cloud mn
Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN”.
Wedding Venues in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility
Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for wedding venues providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.
🏢 20 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 59.72/100⭐ Median Reviews: 116.5📡 791 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:
City map view · St. Cloud, MN
These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.
Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 19
Unmapped businesses: 1
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
19 mapped businesses shown · 1 unmapped.
Top 4 side by side
Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -8.33 below market median (25 vs 33.33)[1][2]
The Grands at Mulligans was observed at position #1 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online
The Grands at Mulligans is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its entity consistency score is 8.33 points below the measured market median (25 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 383 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility: +31.25 above market median (97.5 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
The Regency Venue was observed at position #2 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
The Regency Venue is 31.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (97.5 versus 66.25). Observed review volume is 152 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility: +23.75 above market median (90 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -25 below market median (0 vs 25)[1][2]
Northern Oaks Events was observed at position #3 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Northern Oaks Events is 23.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (90 versus 66.25). Its content coverage score is 25 points below the measured market median (0 versus 25). Observed review volume is 149 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
Local Visibility: +26.25 above market median (92.5 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Harvester Square was observed at position #4 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Harvester Square is 26.25 points above the measured market median for local visibility (92.5 versus 66.25). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 39 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Local Visibility: +23.75 above market median (90 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -33.33 below market median (50 vs 83.33)[1][2]
The Brower House was observed at position #5 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
The Brower House is 23.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (90 versus 66.25). Its technical seo score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (50 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 8 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Rolling Ridge Wedding & Event Center was observed at position #6 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Rolling Ridge Wedding & Event Center is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Observed review volume is 263 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: +3.75 above market median (70 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
The Barn at Stoney Hills was observed at position #7 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
The Barn at Stoney Hills is 3.75 points above the measured market median for local visibility (70 versus 66.25). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 85 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Popple Creek Wedding and Events was observed at position #8 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Popple Creek Wedding and Events's entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 26 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -8.33 below market median (25 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Coyote Moon Grille was observed at position #9 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Coyote Moon Grille is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its entity consistency score is 8.33 points below the measured market median (25 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 1104 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -11.25 below market median (55 vs 66.25)[1][2]
The Park Event Center was observed at position #10 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
The Park Event Center is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its local visibility score is 11.25 points below the measured market median (55 versus 66.25). Observed review volume is 183 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Reviews: +6.2 above market median (87.64 vs 81.44)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Molitor's Quarry Grill & Bar was observed at position #11 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Molitor's Quarry Grill & Bar is 6.2 points above the measured market median for reviews (87.64 versus 81.44). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 476 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
Reviews: +12.03 above market median (93.47 vs 81.44)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
St. Cloud River’s Edge Convention Center was observed at position #12 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 11 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
St. Cloud River’s Edge Convention Center is 12.03 points above the measured market median for reviews (93.47 versus 81.44). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 929 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
Content Coverage: +50 above market median (75 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Enchanted Pines was observed at position #13 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 12 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Enchanted Pines is 50 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 25). Its local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 6 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add current contact information to the local profile.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add current contact information to the local profile[1][2]
Content Coverage: +25 above market median (50 vs 25)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -16.66 below market median (66.67 vs 83.33)[1][2]
The Venue at Gentry Pines was observed at position #14 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 13 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
The Venue at Gentry Pines is 25 points above the measured market median for content coverage (50 versus 25). Its technical seo score is 16.66 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 47 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add clear primary headings on sampled pages.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Add clear primary headings on sampled pages[1][2]
Local Visibility: -36.25 below market median (30 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Reeds & Rushes was observed at position #15 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 14 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Reeds & Rushes's local visibility score is 36.25 points below the measured market median (30 versus 66.25). Observed review volume is 43 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Reviews: +0.21 above market median (81.65 vs 81.44)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -41.25 below market median (25 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Pondview Farm Wedding Venue was observed at position #16 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 15 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Pondview Farm Wedding Venue is 0.21 points above the measured market median for reviews (81.65 versus 81.44). Its local visibility score is 41.25 points below the measured market median (25 versus 66.25). Observed review volume is 90 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +16.67 above market median (50 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -46.25 below market median (20 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Blackberry Ridge Golf Club was observed at position #17 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 16 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Blackberry Ridge Golf Club is 16.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 33.33). Its local visibility score is 46.25 points below the measured market median (20 versus 66.25). Observed review volume is 141 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Local Visibility: -51.25 below market median (15 vs 66.25)[1][2]
The Clearing was observed at position #18 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 17 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
The Clearing's local visibility score is 51.25 points below the measured market median (15 versus 66.25). Observed review volume is 92 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Entity Consistency: +41.67 above market median (75 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -56.25 below market median (10 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Creekside Weddings & Events was observed at position #19 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 18 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Creekside Weddings & Events is 41.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 33.33). Its local visibility score is 56.25 points below the measured market median (10 versus 66.25). Observed review volume is 297 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Local Visibility: -61.25 below market median (5 vs 66.25)[1][2]
Howling Moon Weddings & Events was observed at position #20 for the "Wedding Venue in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 29, 2026 observation. 19 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
Howling Moon Weddings & Events's local visibility score is 61.25 points below the measured market median (5 versus 66.25). Observed review volume is 37 versus a market median of 116.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]
Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards
Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.
Snapshot ID: 77e58fac-7ac5-41c8-9c3c-e80217e6d3c2 · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-29 01:15 UTC · Published: 2026-09-29 01:15 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0
This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.
View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.