Skip to content
Purpose-built comparison

General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN

This market was created from the customer's normalized search intent. Google discovery uses the intent-aware query; the published NextDoorScore score still uses the existing methodology.

Search captured: General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN

Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings. Observed search: “General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN”.

General Contractors in St. Cloud, MN — compared by Google rating, reviews & local visibility

Real competitive search intelligence benchmark for general contractors providers in St. Cloud, MN. Evaluates observable local visibility, technical website health, service content depth, and customer reputation derived from actual NextDoorScore observations.

🏢 20 Providers Analyzed🎯 Market Median Score: 63.97/100⭐ Median Reviews: 17.5📡 725 Attributable Measurements
Sort Comparison By:

City map view · St. Cloud, MN

These are the businesses in this comparison, placed on their real coordinates. Top comparison businesses stay labeled. Geographic position is location only — it is not a score.

Marker Legend
Top comparison businesses
Other businesses
3Clustered businesses
Mapped businesses: 20
Labels show comparison position, not a new score. Geographic position is location only.
20 mapped businesses shown.

Top 4 side by side

Observed Google position for this search. Individual quotes appear only when Google Places returned review text. Listing names, ratings, and addresses shown for this comparison are from Google, refreshed when needed. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own observations, not a permanent copy of Google listings.

The rest of this comparison

RankBusinessRatingGoogle listing quoteLocal Pulse
#5Modern Kraft Construction4.9 ★ (27)“We came to Modern Kraft with a kitchen stuck in the 80s — think oak cabinets, laminate co…”—Profile
#6Prairie Roots Construction——Profile
#7Lutgen Companies4.9 ★ (461)“We are very happy with our new windows, we had 11 double hung and 2 sliders installed, th…”—Profile
#8VanVleet Construction4.9 ★ (27)—Profile
#9Tamm Construction LLC——Profile
#10McGough Construction - St. Cloud Office——Profile
#11Pine Point Construction LLC5.0 ★ (5)“Allen and Linda Werke Pine Point Construction/Jake Byram just wrapped up a rework project…”—Profile
#12AVID Construction——Profile
#13Four Seasons Builders——Profile
#14Landwehr Construction Inc3.7 ★ (19)“To the guy who has no regard for other people’s safety. Weaving in and out of traffic and…”—Profile
#15Lyon Contracting, Inc.——Profile
#16Exterior Pro——Profile
#17Steven Johnson Construction Llc——Profile
#18Quad City Contracting4.8 ★ (49)“Really happy with my experience with Quad City Contracting. They were quick to respond, g…”—Profile
#19Tamm Construction——Profile
#20Commercial Building Contractors, Inc.——Profile
Open NextDoorScore factor analysis for every listing
70.16 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +6.19 points
Market Position: 63.89th percentile
Local Visibility
100
+27.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-16.66 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-1.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +27.5 above market median (100 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -16.66 below market median (66.67 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Dale Gruber Construction was observed at position #1 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation.
Why This Business Differs Online

Dale Gruber Construction is 27.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (100 versus 72.5). Its technical seo score is 16.66 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 16 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
#2
5.0(38 Google listing reviews)
3633 Co Rd 115 Ste 200, St Augusta, MN 56301, USA (320) 247-4005 Official Website
70.84 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +6.87 points
Market Position: 69.44th percentile
Local Visibility
95
+22.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
38
+18.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +22.5 above market median (95 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Ruege Construction LLC was observed at position #2 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 1 business appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
Why This Business Differs Online

Ruege Construction LLC is 22.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (95 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 36 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
76.98 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +13.01 points
Market Position: 97.22th percentile
Local Visibility
95
+22.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
48
+30.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +22.5 above market median (95 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
Four Seasons Contracting was observed at position #3 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 2 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
Why This Business Differs Online

Four Seasons Contracting is 22.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (95 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 48 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
74.92 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +10.95 points
Market Position: 86.11th percentile
Local Visibility
92.5
+20 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+62.5 vs market median
Review Volume
7
-10.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +62.5 above market median (75 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -8.33 below market median (25 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Schoenberg Construction, Inc. was observed at position #4 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 3 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
  3. #3 Four Seasons Contracting
Why This Business Differs Online

Schoenberg Construction, Inc. is 62.5 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 12.5). Its entity consistency score is 8.33 points below the measured market median (25 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 7 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
57.3 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -6.67 points
Market Position: 30.56th percentile
Local Visibility
90
+17.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-16.66 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
27
+9.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +17.5 above market median (90 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Modern Kraft Construction was observed at position #5 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 4 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
  3. #3 Four Seasons Contracting
  4. #4 Schoenberg Construction, Inc.
Why This Business Differs Online

Modern Kraft Construction is 17.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (90 versus 72.5). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 27 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
63.91 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -0.06 points
Market Position: 47.22th percentile
Local Visibility
87.5
+15 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-16.66 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-1.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +16.67 above market median (50 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -16.66 below market median (66.67 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Prairie Roots Construction was observed at position #6 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 5 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
  3. #3 Four Seasons Contracting
  4. #4 Schoenberg Construction, Inc.
  5. #5 Modern Kraft Construction
Why This Business Differs Online

Prairie Roots Construction is 16.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 33.33). Its technical seo score is 16.66 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 16 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add clear primary headings on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add clear primary headings on sampled pages[1][2]
#7
4.9(461 Google listing reviews)
6642 237th St, St Augusta, MN 56301, USA (320) 252-4932 Official Website
Local Visibility
70
-2.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
461
+416.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +22.46 above market median (92.97 vs 70.51)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -2.5 below market median (70 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Lutgen Companies was observed at position #7 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 6 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
  3. #3 Four Seasons Contracting
  4. #4 Schoenberg Construction, Inc.
  5. #5 Modern Kraft Construction
  6. #6 Prairie Roots Construction
Why This Business Differs Online

Lutgen Companies is 22.46 points above the measured market median for reviews (92.97 versus 70.51). Its local visibility score is 2.5 points below the measured market median (70 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 434 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
73.53 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +9.56 points
Market Position: 80.56th percentile
Local Visibility
82.5
+10 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
27
+8.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +16.67 above market median (50 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
No major trailing factors observed
VanVleet Construction was observed at position #8 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 7 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
  3. #3 Four Seasons Contracting
  4. #4 Schoenberg Construction, Inc.
  5. #5 Modern Kraft Construction
  6. #6 Prairie Roots Construction
  7. #7 Lutgen Companies
Why This Business Differs Online

VanVleet Construction is 16.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (50 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 26 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
39.25 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -24.72 points
Market Position: 13.89th percentile
Local Visibility
80
+7.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-83.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-16.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Local Visibility: +7.5 above market median (80 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -83.33 below market median (0 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Tamm Construction LLC was observed at position #9 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 8 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
  3. #3 Four Seasons Contracting
  4. #4 Schoenberg Construction, Inc.
  5. #5 Modern Kraft Construction
  6. #6 Prairie Roots Construction
  7. #7 Lutgen Companies
  8. #8 VanVleet Construction
Why This Business Differs Online

Tamm Construction LLC is 7.5 points above the measured market median for local visibility (80 versus 72.5). Its technical seo score is 83.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
63.75 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -0.22 points
Market Position: 41.67th percentile
Local Visibility
77.5
+5 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-16.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Technical SEO: +16.67 above market median (100 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -15.49 below market median (55.02 vs 70.51)[1][2]
McGough Construction - St. Cloud Office was observed at position #10 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 9 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
  3. #3 Four Seasons Contracting
  4. #4 Schoenberg Construction, Inc.
  5. #5 Modern Kraft Construction
  6. #6 Prairie Roots Construction
  7. #7 Lutgen Companies
  8. #8 VanVleet Construction
  9. #9 Tamm Construction LLC
Why This Business Differs Online

McGough Construction - St. Cloud Office is 16.67 points above the measured market median for technical seo (100 versus 83.33). Its reviews score is 15.49 points below the measured market median (55.02 versus 70.51). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]
64.03 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +0.06 points
Market Position: 52.78th percentile
Local Visibility
75
+2.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
66.67
-16.66 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+62.5 vs market median
Review Volume
5
-12.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +62.5 above market median (75 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Pine Point Construction LLC was observed at position #11 for the "General Contractor in St. Cloud, MN" search during SEOuP's September 24, 2026 observation. 10 businesses appeared above it in that same observation.
  1. #1 Dale Gruber Construction
  2. #2 Ruege Construction LLC
  3. #3 Four Seasons Contracting
  4. #4 Schoenberg Construction, Inc.
  5. #5 Modern Kraft Construction
  6. #6 Prairie Roots Construction
  7. #7 Lutgen Companies
  8. #8 VanVleet Construction
  9. #9 Tamm Construction LLC
  10. #10 McGough Construction - St. Cloud Office
Why This Business Differs Online

Pine Point Construction LLC is 62.5 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 12.5). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 5 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
35.19 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -28.78 points
Market Position: 8.33th percentile
Local Visibility
45
-27.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-83.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+11.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +4.11 above market median (74.62 vs 70.51)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -83.33 below market median (0 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

AVID Construction is 4.11 points above the measured market median for reviews (74.62 versus 70.51). Its technical seo score is 83.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 29 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
52.32 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -11.65 points
Market Position: 25th percentile
Local Visibility
40
-32.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+96.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +13.83 above market median (84.34 vs 70.51)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Entity Consistency: -33.33 below market median (0 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Four Seasons Builders is 13.83 points above the measured market median for reviews (84.34 versus 70.51). Its entity consistency score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 33.33). Observed review volume is 114 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Add accessible business contact information.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Add accessible business contact information[1][2]
76.05 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +12.08 points
Market Position: 91.67th percentile
Local Visibility
67.5
-5 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
75
+62.5 vs market median
Review Volume
19
+1.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +62.5 above market median (75 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -11.83 below market median (58.68 vs 70.51)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Landwehr Construction Inc is 62.5 points above the measured market median for content coverage (75 versus 12.5). Its reviews score is 11.83 points below the measured market median (58.68 versus 70.51). Observed review volume is 19 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
68.7 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +4.73 points
Market Position: 58.33th percentile
Local Visibility
65
-7.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-12.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +41.67 above market median (75 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Content Coverage: -12.5 below market median (0 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Lyon Contracting, Inc. is 41.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 33.33). Its content coverage score is 12.5 points below the measured market median (0 versus 12.5). Observed review volume is 5 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Answer relevant service questions missing from the sampled content[1][2]
#16
Unrated(0 Google listing reviews)
72.32 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: +8.35 points
Market Position: 75th percentile
Local Visibility
62.5
-10 vs market median
Technical SEO
100
+16.67 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
+288.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Reviews: +19.94 above market median (90.45 vs 70.51)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -10 below market median (62.5 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Exterior Pro is 19.94 points above the measured market median for reviews (90.45 versus 70.51). Its local visibility score is 10 points below the measured market median (62.5 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 306 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
Local Visibility
60
-12.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Content Coverage
Insufficient data
Insufficient data vs market median
Review Volume
0
-16.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Local Profile: -33.33 below market median (66.67 vs 100)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Steven Johnson Construction Llc's local profile score is 33.33 points below the measured market median (66.67 versus 100). Observed review volume is 1 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Connect the official website to the local profile.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Connect the official website to the local profile[1][2]
#18
4.8(49 Google listing reviews)
1310 2nd St N, Sauk Rapids, MN 56379, USA (320) 428-5589 Official Website
57.36 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -6.61 points
Market Position: 36.11th percentile
Local Visibility
15
-57.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
49
+31.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Entity Consistency: +41.67 above market median (75 vs 33.33)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Local Visibility: -57.5 below market median (15 vs 72.5)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Quad City Contracting is 41.67 points above the measured market median for entity consistency (75 versus 33.33). Its local visibility score is 57.5 points below the measured market median (15 versus 72.5). Observed review volume is 49 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the measured local-search visibility gap.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the measured local-search visibility gap[1][2]
34.25 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -29.72 points
Market Position: 2.78th percentile
Local Visibility
55
-17.5 vs market median
Technical SEO
0
-83.33 vs market median
Content Coverage
0
-12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-12.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Balanced with market baselines
Largest Observed Gap
Technical SEO: -83.33 below market median (0 vs 83.33)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Tamm Construction's technical seo score is 83.33 points below the measured market median (0 versus 83.33). Observed review volume is 5 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review missing canonical tags on sampled pages[1][2]
49.67 / 100
Overall NextDoorScore Score
Observable digital search authority benchmark
Vs Market Median: -14.3 points
Market Position: 19.44th percentile
Local Visibility
52.5
-20 vs market median
Technical SEO
83.33
0 vs market median
Content Coverage
25
+12.5 vs market median
Review Volume
0
-17.5 vs median (17.5)
Strongest Observed Advantage
Content Coverage: +12.5 above market median (25 vs 12.5)[1][2]
Largest Observed Gap
Reviews: -70.51 below market median (0 vs 70.51)[1][2]
Why This Business Differs Online

Commercial Building Contractors, Inc. is 12.5 points above the measured market median for content coverage (25 versus 12.5). Its reviews score is 70.51 points below the measured market median (0 versus 70.51). Observed review volume is 0 versus a market median of 17.5; this is a volume comparison, not a service-quality assessment. First measured action: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market.[1][2][3]

Largest Observable Opportunity: Review the public review-volume gap relative to this market[1][2]

Who Has the Advantage? Factor Leaderboards

Independent rankings for each measured search factor within this snapshot. Ranks reflect observable digital data, not an endorsement.

Highest Observed Local Visibility Scores
Market Median: 72.5 · Average: 70.38 · Range: 15–100 (20 measured)

Service × Location Content Detection Matrix

Observed coverage of essential service and location content on sampled official websites.

Detected Content CheckRuege Construction LLCSchoenberg Construction, Inc.Dale Gruber ConstructionAVID ConstructionFour Seasons BuildersVanVleet ConstructionTamm Construction LLCPrairie Roots ConstructionSteven Johnson Construction LlcLyon Contracting, Inc.Landwehr Construction IncCommercial Building Contractors, Inc.Tamm ConstructionPine Point Construction LLCFour Seasons ContractingQuad City ContractingMcGough Construction - St. Cloud OfficeLutgen CompaniesModern Kraft ConstructionExterior Pro
Service content
18 measured
✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]
Location content
18 measured
✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]
Service and location coverage
18 measured
✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✓ Detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]
Relevant FAQs
18 measured
✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]—✗ Not detected[1]✗ Not detected[1]

Snapshot Provenance & Methodology Disclosure

Snapshot ID: 97db9dda-dc1d-4ca7-9be5-9565d0b7e5f2 · Scoring Cutoff (asOf): 2026-09-24 09:49 UTC · Published: 2026-09-24 09:49 UTC · Methodology Version: 1.1.0

This comparison is a published, immutable snapshot. Scores evaluate observable digital search signals (local visibility, website accessibility, service content, and reviews) and do not evaluate physical craftsmanship, licensing, or safety.

View Full Methodology Weights & Scoring Rules
Methodology Factor Weights:
  • Local Visibility (20%): Verified local-search position and explicitly observed category, location, and service-area relevance.
  • Local Profile (15%): Measured completeness of public local-profile information.
  • Reviews (15%): Observed public rating, review volume, and review recency when measured.
  • Technical SEO (20%): Explicitly measured website accessibility, metadata, indexability, and technical checks.
  • Content Coverage (15%): Detected relevant service, local, and supporting content within the sampled website.
  • Entity Consistency (15%): Explicit cross-source consistency checks and detected business identity information.
Scoring Rules:
  • Scores describe observable digital signals, not workmanship, customer service, licensing, safety, or business quality.
  • Each factor is the arithmetic mean of its measured signals on a 0–100 scale. Signal coverage is shown separately; absent or unavailable signals are never zeroes.
  • The overall score is the weighted mean of all six factors and is unavailable until every factor has at least one measured signal. Factor coverage can differ across businesses.
  • Only attributable observations at or before the fixed asOf date, no more than 90 days old, and not expired at asOf are scored. The latest observation for a signal controls its availability.
  • Boolean checks score 100 for true and 0 for false. Rating scores rating / 5 × 100. Review volume scores min(100, log10(count + 1) / 3 × 100), a disclosed saturation benchmark of 999 reviews, not a quality assessment.
  • Review recency scores exp(-days / 180) × 100. Verified local-search rank scores max(0, 1 - (rank - 1) / 20) × 100; discovery-list order is never a search rank.
  • Measured percentages are used directly. Broken-link count scores 100 only for an explicitly measured zero, otherwise 0. Scores and statistics round to two decimals.
  • Market statistics exclude unavailable values. Midrank percentile = 100 × (number below + half the number tied) / measured sample size; an all-tied sample is at the 50th percentile.
  • Opportunities describe measured gaps, not estimated traffic or revenue. Missing observations never create an opportunity. Raw observations, source references, and dates remain visible.
  • Observed Google position is the 1-based order returned by the configured Google Places text search for a specific query, location, and observation time. It is not a universal or permanent Google rank. SEOuP stores Place IDs and its own audit observations; Google listing fields are a short-lived display cache with required attribution.